Stay updated with breaking news from Shout yovanovitch. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Somalia. As if this is another step by the president to intimidate witnesses. He did not intimidate to you. You are here. You have endured. There are other people out there that can expect this before treatment if they come forward. That is a question for us. You also indicated that the president has a prerogative to appoint a noncareer person, and to be candid, republican president s and democratic president s have done that. Mr. Sondlands transcript is out, and he was someone who indicated that everything hinged, the white house meeting and the release of the vital
defensive aid, everything hinged on the president president zelensky being able to do that election that would benefit the trump campaign. You are aware of that . Yes. And you have indicated that would be something that you would not agree to do . Yes. And sondland was quite willing to do . Apparently so. I think you for your professional service and a yield back. Ambassador yovanovitch, thank you for being here. It has be ....
bret: it was compelling testimony throughout the day. we have our panel, chris wallace, martha maccallum, dana perino, juan williams, andy mccarthy, and judge ken starr, your thoughts for spray to the last time we had a break i was quite critical of the republicans in the fact that i said the dog that has not barked, there were all of these allegations, rudy giuliani had made, various republicans had made that she was disloyal to the president, that she really was not a corruption fighter, ue last republican congressman jim jordan who went after her on the fact that there were a number of top ukrainian officials, even the ukrainian ambassador to the united states here in washington who during the 20 2016 campaign said very critical things about candidate donald trump, and in s very effective way, jim jordan asked marie yovanovitch, who did ....
Direction once that tweet was read into the record here. this is where at least stefanik says it is not about a tweet he said to the beginning of the story is to get to you, meaning yovanovitch out of the way. they wanted those bidens and viewed you as the obstacle. the sound bite that we will probably reminder depending on how public opinion goes, chris stewart, a republican of utah earlier in the hearing said i bet this does not change the direction of public in pinon for impeachment at all. you can see obviously that people will fire that back at chris stewart if that effect changes. but again, so they are done for the day. and adam schiff would not commit to next thursday being the final open impeachment hearing, the russian experts will be here that afternoon. bret: chad, thank you, i will bring in the panel of new york before we head over to neil cavuto. we mentioned this earlier, but ....
General woman from new york over and over again. it is not fair. reporter: do you think it is a fair process the second sentence of that tweet, for example, one example, adam schiff never brought this up. the second sentence goes back to the july 25th call transcript, and in that president zelensky is saying to president trump that he is concerned that ambassador yovanovitch is a bad ambassador and president zelensky believes that ambassador yovanovitch had an alliance toe present in person ankle. adam schiff when posing that to respond to the tweet never even mention that. that s what adam schiff did and does. the acting director of national intelligence, his opening statement, he made up a fictitious call transcript of july 25th, because the real one does not have a bribery that he wants to allege. so just like that, make believe what he called, and he created a ....
The president. is it intimidating? no, the witness was able to answer questions. the only people that were limited from asking questions were republican members because we were muzzled by adam schiff. when we are talking about impeachment, we are talking about impeachable offenses. you can disagree or agree, i happen to disagree with a tweet, but as we know, the democrats wanted to continue making this a political food fight. they are going about this in a partisan way. this is a very serious matter when we are talking about impeachment. this is a constitutional matter, not about tweets. reporter: congresswoman, do you worry about the president s decision to recall based on what you learn today? i agree with ambassador yovanovitch s testimony where she says it is good policy that the president of the united states can determine who serves as their ambassador? reporter: you agree with his decision? i agree with the right to ....