If motion stay we ask that you deny it. Thank you. Thank you ill give you five minutes for rebuttal. I want to address a couple of quick points. Whatever den says about looking at counselor decisionmaking does not suggest we look behind National Security determines made by the president that determination four corners of determination are based on the congressional determination that the country at issue is of different. I thought you were using den and mandel as your now youre saying its distinguishable, are you relying on those cases or not . We are relying on them for the limits that the Court Reviews this issue. Im adding when you have a document itself and thats best evidence of intent of the president relies excluively on the cause made by congress by the safety concerns presented by the countries at issue that is the end of the inquiry and should be. The fact i know counsel for the other side cited this Court Car Danous Decision and they in dedescribing the state of the Law Cour
the restrictions are not about the threat in those countries. there s been confusion about that. does the courts in the entd do they want to get between president and his authority to decide where the threat is. because historically president have the power to say japan, iraq, if they pick it, they can limit it. that s been part of the president s article 2 powers. it s tricky for a judge to see whos coming if from president trump willing to take fight to supreme court if necessary. mr. president how far are you willing to take the travel ban fight? to the system. regardless of me or whoever succeeds at later date we have