john: america reports, waiting for a federal judge s ruling on the fate of title 42. decision could come down any minute as border states brace for a bigger crisis if the trump era immigration order is allowed to expire on monday. i m john roberts. gillian: great to be with you, john. gillian turner in for sandra smith. border areas are seeing a big surge in activity in anticipation of the title 42 decision in the del rio sector in texas, 1800 migrants in 24 hours. a large number of those people were single adults. that s the migrant demographic that is likelyest to be expelled under title 42. john: texas governor abbott says it will only get worse. it would surpass the population of houston if title 42 is not renewed. 18,000 pouring into border states every day. bill joins us from the border in eagle pass, texas. what are you seeing there? john, good afternoon to you. del rio sector getting hammered with activity, nearly 2,000 illegal crossings in just 24 hours, an
tonight. bill melugin is in he ll pass, texas with what this means for officials and states along the border. but we begin with peter doocy on what the ruling says and the politics of this moment. peter is traveling with the president in seoul, south korea, good evening peter, good morning i should say to you. peter: good morning from saturday morning in korea a bret. and keeping this policy and deporting more people that come into this country illegally may wind up being politically beneficial to the president. but on paper, this would be a loss for white house officials who have long said title 42 is not their immigration policy it is a public health policy put in place by the trump administration. and they thought that they could stop using covid as a reason onto deport people but a judge is not satisfied with post title 42 plan. so, in this ruling, part of it says the records support the plaintiff s state position that the termination order will result in increased bord
The trial will focus on what sussmann said, i think what hillary s role will be a major factor in any congressional investigations, bret, that may start next year when the republicans take over the house. bret: but susan, to jonathan turley s point what are we looking at here? this is really a case about michael sussmann lying to the fbi. but does it get to a john durham narrative that lays all of this out? you know, watergate and i m thinking it s been 50 years since watergate. since the watergate scandal. and we are still trying to figure out some of the implications, some of the motivations, what real really happened. who did what. do you think 50 years from now we will still be talking about what happened with russia and efforts to make russia what russia actually did in the 2016 election and what allegations that the trump people have denied and debunked in some
Cases? maybe so. bret: yeah. i don t know. i do know that, juan, there is not a lot of places that are covering it. this trial because they have to explain it and they haven t explained it from the beginning. all right, midterm races. juan, we each each of you to pick a race of interest. juan, what did you choose? i think everybody has got eyes on pennsylvania. on the g.o.p. senate primary there. obviously no winner as of yet. i think today the a.p., which often makes the call said they can t make a call. you got fewer than 1,000 votes separating, i think it s 1,000 votes separating mehmet oz and david mccormick. so, this is dividing the republican ranks going into a very important senate race. i think everybody should keep an eye on it. bret: matthew, your race? my race is the nevada senate race. the republicans need to pick up one senate seat if they hold the four retiring seats.
Revelation that the clinton campaign itself was distributing the story, getting it from marc elias and that entire chain had been carefully hidden throughout the election period. i mean, it s too late to have any political or i expect legal consequences, but it is remarkable. it is incredible. it ties it directly to hillary herself. one wonders what the mueller investigation was doing that they didn t discover any of this at the time and it took durham and a witness for the defense, i might add, to bring out this remarkable revelation. bret: what about the last part of that sound bite about mueller? why does in not come out in a year of investigation? why doesn t all of this come out into the light, number one? number two, by mook testifying when he did, the judge has now let that clinton tweet that he was going to exclude into the trial. and the jury has seen that tweet. yeah. and it s very damning.