Tonight on all in. We are going to walked onto the capitol. Donald trump indited all over again. This time for the same crime using the same charges. Conspiring to defraud the United States, conspiring to disenfranchise voters, and conspiring and attempting to obstruct an official proceeding. Tonight, what special counsel jack smith presented to a new grand jury and what it means for the prosecution. With a fresh indictment for the republican nominee, the Harris Campaign run against trump. Why not debater . They already know everything. Georgia and beyond. What we are learning about attempts to subvert the election this time around when all in starts now. Good evening from miami, i am katie phang in for chris hayes. We are 70 days out from election day. Just 10 days away from mail in ballots things sent out in some states in the republican nominee for president was just indited all over again. For trying to steal the last election. Earlier today, special counsel jack smith unveiled a n
It is tuesday, so i must be talking about, you guessed it, project 2025. Digging through this 900page tome is my work until election day. Then theres this other part, cutting taxes for corporations and the wealthiest among us. Now, today the progressive think tank, center for American Progress, released an analysis of what project 2025s tax plan would actuallys look like for Americas Bank accounts if trump enacted it. The top lines in this thing are amazing. According to the center for American Progress project 2025s tax plan would cut taxes for households making more than 10 million a year by an average of 2. 4 million a year, which is great news for the hyperwealthy, but what about for the rest of america . Check out this chart. This is a visualization of the added tax burdensu for a middle class a married couple with two c children under project 2025s tax plan. Under the plan families by that description that make anywhere between 35,000 a year and 170,000 a year would all see their
court document to her appointment. for fetal abnormality, that exception requires a sign off of two doctors. do you think those limits are reasonable? those are exceptions that have been talked about for many, many, years. the legislature put that in very carefully. yes, of course, i think they are reasonable. what is your reaction to that? this is what happens when politicians try to dictate medical policy. there is a lack of understanding. for every pregnancy and the different circumstances that can occur during a pregnancy, that may lead to a need for abortion access. i think about women like deborah dover in florida who confined to physicians who would certify that she had a fetal abnormality. she was forced to give birth to a child who did not survive outside of the. i think a woman like tania cook, who was forced to travel to south carolina to receive medical care in a really harrowing emergency medical situation. it is clear these exceptions are working. the abortion bans
affected it jumps to up to $250,000 fine per occurrence. the legislature put in place these laws and these protections so that in times of vulnerability like this people cannot be taken advantage of. now that hasn t affected some people from trying to do the things that we re talking about. however, again, the emphasis being on the fact that so many people uniting coming together and doing good. how do you determine, mark, where do you draw the line between supply and demand and price gouging in situations like raising the price on gas and water and the splice people need? look just trying to base that you are a business trying to make money and the supply is small. listen we are free market people. we believe the market deserves to and should set pricing and succeed and make profit.
welcome back to sanford, florida. i m ashleigh banfield recording live at the seminole county justice center. that has been a very busy place the last few weeks and we re in the homestretch of the second degree murder trial against george zimmerman. the judge is looking over case law right now. good opportunity to get to danny and faith. danny, i want you to comment for me, if you will, right now, over how critical in a case jury instructions are. honestly, when you hear them being read in a courtroom, they re so technical, they sound so eloquently worded, like a legislature put them together, oftentimes i wonder if they re lost on the jury and yet they re battling tooth and nail for every word. no. i think they re critical. here s why. when the attorneys give their closing argument, i think jurors take a little understand, look, they re obviously biased. this is the adversarial system.