Wt is the full extent cleared away. Chuck rosenberg. Of the democrats prior senator mccains former coordination with the whistleblower, and who else did colleague, jeff flake, retired the whistleblower coordinate senator from arizona, surmised this effort with . That if a secret impeachment second, what is the full extent vote were held, 3035 of the of ukraines Election Meddling Senate republican members would against the Trump Campaign . Vote to impeach. And i thought how sad, how sad, and third, why did burisma hire that it takes a secret vote to hunter biden, and what did he do for them, and did his position make a courageous vote. Affect any u. S. Government actions under the obama it should be 3035 if they administration . These questions will remain believe thats the right thing to do. I know im sounding naive, but i outstanding because republicans were denied the right to call witnesses that know these remember being saddened by that. I feel the same way. Answers. What we will w
his allies derided and smeared her while she was still ambassador undermining american diplomacy president appoint and remove him passages but usually done publicly criticize them as donald trump has and in real time during impeachment proceedings as we see it or testifying the president is attacking you would twitter . what effect do you think that has on other witnesses willingness to come forward . and expose wrongdoing. and it s very intimidating i want you know sure that some of us here take witness intimidation very very seriously later trump hit back so you know what i what i have the right to speak i have freedom of speech just as other people do regarding the central accusation of the impeachment inquiry evanovich wasn t in post when trump withheld aid to ukraine allegedly to get ukraine s president to investigate joe
sit are testifying the president is attacking you would twitter what effect do you think that has on other witnesses willingness to come forward. and expose wrongdoing. and it s very intimidating i want to let you know sure that some of us here take witness intimidation very very seriously later trump hit back so you know what i what i have the right to speak i have freedom of speech just as other people do regarding the central accusation of the impeachment inquiry evanovich wasn t in post when trump withheld aid to ukraine allegedly to get ukraine s president to investigate joe biden troubles political rival whose son was paid significant amounts on the board of ukrainian gas company. in the run up to the 2020 presidential election what everyone is watching for is whether the threat of impeachment affects trump s popularity right now the polls say it doesn t.
the congressional hearing where it said everywhere marie of out of it went turned back she started off in somalia how did that go then ukraine the new president spoke unfavorably about her in my 2nd phone call with him it s a u.s. president absolute right to appoint ambassadors now both trump s defenders and detractors praise of out of it for her work here s the exchange between the intelligence committee chairman and event of it about the tweet and now the president real time is attacking. what effect do you think that has on other witnesses willingness to come forward. and expose wrongdoing. it s very intimidating to dine designed to intimidate is it not. i mean i can t speak to what the president is trying to do but i think the effect is to be intimidating. let s get more now from oliver salih our correspondent in
last several weeks, there are still missing pieces. the president has instructed the state department and other agencies to ignore congressional subpoenas for documents come his instructed witnesses to different nye subpoenas and refused to appear. any is suggested that those who do expose wrongdoing should be treated like traitors and spies. these actions will force congress to consider, as it did with president nixon, whether trump s obstruction constituted additional grounds for impeachment. if the president can simply refuse all oversight, particularly in the context of an impeachment proceeding to come of the balance of power between our two branches of government will be irrevocably altered. that is not what the founders intended. the prospects for further corruption and abuse of power in this administration or any other will be exponentially increased.