Stay updated with breaking news from Espinoza jackson. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
potential custody fight, not because she fears her husband. theo means the world to his parents. how many of us have argued over the care of our children? how many of guys have done and said things in an emotional moment for which we are deeply sorry? the mayor s charges are billed on an erroneous [no audio] thank you, ma am. next, please. thank you. my name is espinoza jackson. i have been a career activists for 50 years or better. n surprised that you have had this commission for just 18 years. you have a hard decision. i m hopingñi that you do the rit thing. as the previous speaker said, the family knows best. and the innuendoes about brutality she was bruised because a lot of us are easy tubers, and we all know that. i want you to takece- the facts are, and not what people or the press gave up. please, do the right thing. so that you can sleep at night and people can look up to you in years to come. you are very young and you will continue to run for offic ....
no evidence. to go it can be attributed to the share to the fact that he said i did not want the raise, i want to get this over with and lay the facts out and not let the newspaper tell me what the facts are. if he had done that on j. griffitanuary 5th, i do not thiy of us would be here. qlk but assume she would do t he told her to do. it assumes a lot of things that may not be true. i do agree with you the mayor can take into account events after he was sworn in up until the time of the plea. i also think you should take into account what the sheriff was able to do during the time that he did serve. it is clear from testimony that he was in the midst of accomplishing significant progress in the sheriff s department. i want to ask you about the video. in their she refers to the sheriff of having sent as having said he is a powerful man. the mayor is arguing that demonstrates the concerted use of his power oa share to get advantage in a custody dispute. why isn t t ....
mayor acted reasonably in exercising his discretion he could take into account the events or acts that occurred between the time of december 31 and march 19 date when he acted. one of the troubling things is miss lopez s assertion of the attorney/client privilege. based on her testimony, it was absolutely clear to me and clear to the court there ruled against her on this point that she was not talking to her as a lawyer. she talked to her over a time of the year about problems with her marriage and said she talked to her as a friend. when she talked to ms. haines and told her about the discussion, she did not say i went to miss madison as my lawyer. it was clear she was saying i want to miss madison it did not think she would disclose it, i thought it would be confidential. there is not any evidence in the record that supports the claim of attorney/client privilege. that troubles me that in an investigation it would have been the one thing if the sheriff had set on janu ....
sheriff. no evidence. to go it can be attributed to the share to the fact that he said i did not want the raise, i want to get this over with and lay the facts out and not let the newspaper tell me what the facts are. if he had done that on j. griffitanuary 5th, i do not thiy of us would be here. qlk but assume she would do t he told her to do. it assumes a lot of things that may not be true. i do agree with you the mayor can take into account events after he was sworn in up until the time of the plea. i also think you should take into account what the sheriff was able to do during the time that he did serve. it is clear from testimony that he was in the midst of accomplishing significant progress in the sheriff s department. i want to ask you about the video. in their she refers to the sheriff of having sent as having said he is a powerful man. the mayor is arguing that demonstrates the concerted use of his power oa share to get advantage in a custody dispute. wh ....
sheriff. no evidence. to go it can be attributed to the share to the fact that he said i did not want the raise, i want to get this over with and lay the facts out and not let the newspaper tell me what the facts are. if he had done that on j. griffitanuary 5th, i do not thiy of us would be here. qlk but assume she would do t he told her to do. it assumes a lot of things that may not be true. i do agree with you the mayor can take into account events after he was sworn in up until the time of the plea. i also think you should take into account what the sheriff was able to do during the time that he did serve. it is clear from testimony that he was in the midst of accomplishing significant progress in the sheriff s department. i want to ask you about the video. in their she refers to the sheriff of having sent as having said he is a powerful man. the mayor is arguing that demonstrates the concerted use of his power oa share to get advantage in a custody dispute. wh ....