Lynn Gavin News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Lynn gavin. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Lynn Gavin Today - Breaking & Trending Today
November 25th has two new ones and they were provided at my request. And we have a december 3rd, alternative special mix that was combined with a combination of the director. So those are the origins of the document. Right. And the mixes. For the purpose of the motion and the second, i believe that the maker is speaking about the december 3rd memo in the alternative special mix giving direction for three scenarios under the hedge funds. One being a fund to fund, one being inhouse and one being a mix to see how the numbers fall. Is that accurate . That is accurate. Im reading into your comments that you didnt expect the Due Diligence on staffs part to be between 30 and 60 days but you had something less in mind although im not sure if there was a specific date, so for the sake of the motion. For the sake of the motion, i will yield to our director, he knows how long it will take to get the data in terms of time span. I would yield t ....
Request. And we have a december 3rd, alternative special mix that was combined with a combination of the director. So those are the origins of the document. Right. And the mixes. For the purpose of the motion and the second, i believe that the maker is speaking about the december 3rd memo in the alternative special mix giving direction for three scenarios under the hedge funds. One being a fund to fund, one being inhouse and one being a mix to see how the numbers fall. Is that accurate . That is accurate. Im reading into your comments that you didnt expect the Due Diligence on staffs part to be between 30 and 60 days but you had something less in mind although im not sure if there was a specific date, so for the sake of the motion. For the sake of the motion, i will yield to our director, he knows how long it will take to get the data in terms of time span. I would yield to him for the data. We are confident we can have the data fo ....
Approximately 10 years ago, our investment and policy and beliefs is in our books. Thats what answers many of your questions about who we are and what we believe in and what we are trying the do here. Thats also a public document. I appreciate Margaret Young who asked a lot of questions. I definitely want to answer those questions to prove to you why we are trying to prove our active allocation process for better returns to keep active employers contributions down and to get the citys contributions down so they will have more money whether its for employees and all the programs that this city is trying to do for the citizens of San Francisco. Thats what this allocation process is really all about. You want more time, lets take it. Vicepresident . Thank you very much. My question is through the chair to commissioners bridges, you specifically say that your proposal or the propo ....
You basically the target of our return and what the value and the return will be in the marketplace. Thats what im looking for. I will do a little bit of clean up here. First on the new allocation mixes that we have. There are two of them. I will put them by date. November 25th has two new ones and they were provided at my request. And we have a december 3rd, alternative special mix that was combined with a combination of the director. So those are the origins of the document. Right. And the mixes. For the purpose of the motion and the second, i believe that the maker is speaking about the december 3rd memo in the alternative special mix giving direction for three scenarios under the hedge funds. One being a fund to fund, one being inhouse and one being a mix to see how the numbers fall. Is that accurate . That is accurate. Im reading into your comments that you didnt expect the Due Diligence on staffs part to be between 30 and 60 ....
Ways in which the term substantial evidence is used in ceqa. One is an evidencery standard. One is an appellate standard. The way in which this is introduced in this legislation has to do with evidence and very simply, if you want to make a case for conclusion, whether you is the city or you is the appellant, you need to substantial evident to support it. Thats all that this ordinance says. Thats what the state statutes say, thats what the state guidelines say, thats what the statute says. It doesnt produce any permissible standard. The other way in which substantial evidence is used in ceqa is as a standard of review. And in very simple terms, theres two basic standards. Theres substantial evidence which is defresidential to a lead agency, it primarily applies to eirs and addenda and infill exemptions. And theres fair argument which primarily applies to negative declarations. This does not addressing that. In fact, more broadly, this ordinance does not address the substance of how ceq ....