Stay updated with breaking news from Ear drone strike. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
are inherent in marbury versus madison are like delivering a seal when requested, because there is a separate statute, and the secretary of the state had two of the hats on and he was on one hand the direct agent of the president, and that could never be examinable by the courts, but on the other hand, the original statute had imposed all of the purely ministerial duties that had to do with the recordkeeping and delivering of documents and if you had a land deed that had a seal on it, and the person asked for it no, discretion at all, but the take-care clause, there is no statute that could impose on the president, a, a mandatory duty to engage, and the notion that when the president is meeting with the department of justice and enforce federal fraud statutes and that being ministerial strikes me as insupportable. well, i think that you are missing what i am asking. which is, i think that it is paradoxical to say that his constitutional duty to take care of the laws b ....
Here. never before has there been allegations that a sitting president with private individuals and using levers of power sought to fundamentally subvert the democratic republic and electoral system, and frankly, if that fact pattern arises again, i think it would be scary if there were not some mechanism to reach that criminally. and in your brief, you raised some sort of lesser immunity potentially applying. do you want to speak to that? i do. we think it does not come into play here, but the point is that in some sort of more challenging cases, it might be that where a president is operating under extraordinary time pressure has to make a very difficult sort of national security-type decision, and do i go in commit this kind of, do we ord ear drone strike under these circumstances, you know, a president will have a ....