Page 30 - Duh News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Duh. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
it starts with her and ends up in trump s favor. congressman mcclintock from california.. you are a great expert on the budget. that is another topic. tell us from your vantage point what the supreme court ruling means. it s a great big duh. the president has statutory authority to do precisely what he did. it was held up by a left wing activist judge but this is a power used by the presidents going back to 1970s, dozens of times. now it means we can actually use the funds to defend our own border. i was with the president when he was explicit in his instructions to the commander of the army corps of engineers is responsible for the project. he wants 400 miles of new or replaced fencing by the end of next year. i think now he will get it. congressman waltz, we still don t hear democrats put forth any legislation. ....
If that was a response,u congratulations to you, you are a good person. now to number three. this one is about immigration. women and children trying to come here with nothing but the shorts on their back to create an opportunity and to provide for this nation are acting more and the american tradition on this president is right now. tucker: the question is, who is more american? actual americans or foreigners who spit in our customs that mock our laws by speaking into our country illegally and calling us racist if we try to make them leave? this is a tough one. keep thinking. okay, times up. the answer is, illegal aliens are the real americans. duh, if you doubt of that for a second, please hate yourself, you deserve it. now for the final question, this is the daily double. see how you do. criticisms of youic is that - the washington post reported you four pinocchios breaks because there s a lot of people more concerned about being ....
Non-disclosure agreements. this is the legal question, duh, common sense questions all combi combined. if everyone knows that you are meeting with vladimir putin and you said there is nothing to hide, why are you hiding so much of the content. in the law they call that consciousness of guilt. we are not there yet but it raises that question. ari, we are not seeing the forest with the trees. everyday there are new details of donald trump and the way he behaves towards russia and taking notes away from the interpreter and the fbi is worried he s an asset. it feels overwhelming of the amount of information we have. sure. if you were an investigator would you point to any of these that there are already evidence out there. why are you still asking more questions? yes, you viewers at home home god, it looks a lot. ....
only one dummy. and it s not you. wire in this together. so i had always thought that collusion was the stuff that hand before the elections. that s why i asked mike about the russian questions. those were things they agreed to answer because they were before he was president. they may or may not have answered questions about his conduct while he was president with counter intel. it certainly looked like collusion was ongoing but we didn t know they thought so too. look, there s the notion that, yes, i think i want to think about mike schmidt s colleague s reporting here it has blown up a lot of preconceptions. we re like duh, of course. if there was collusion, if there was collusion during the campaign, it wouldn t have stopped on election day. of course it would continue. it would have died and stalled. similarly if it was obstruction, part of what the obstruction was not just about saving donald trump s skin ....
Her successor. writing that mainstream outlets have become the opposition party. let s discuss. jessica tarlov. kelsey, is this a duh , admitting that the new york times is anti-trump? if you are conservative. but i hope it s a wake-up call for those on the left to been in denial about the anti-trump buyers coming out of the new york times and i think what s important to point out about this piece in this book coming out is that this isn t some anonymous rogue reporter coming forward, it s the former managing editor of the new york times fully admitting and owning the fact that her former publication has a serious problem. i do hope the left takes this seriously. i hope everyone involved in journalism takes it seriously because journalism is an important institution in this country. ....