Page 2 - Duffy Cann News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana

Stay updated with breaking news from Duffy cann. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Top News In Duffy Cann Today - Breaking & Trending Today

SFGTV Government Access Programming December 28, 2017

Consistent with current planning code requirements, and the proposed revision would be consistent with both. The only thing i would point out is that generally, if a project had already been noticed and comes back and proposes to raise the height by a couple of feet, it would trigger renotice. In this case, obviously, all of the people that have received notice and are engaged are verien gauged in this process. The rest of the revisions are just at the discretion of the board. Im available for any questions you may have. Mr. Teague, what was the what is the max height they can go in comparison to where were at now . So i think well, as was mentioned during the permit holders presentation, the height district here its a 40 foot height district, but because its rh1 dd, you take a 45 angle from either the front Property Line or the front set back line, and that can go up to 35 feet, and then, it basically follows grade from there. If ....

Glen Park , United States , San Francisco , Duffy Cann , Bernie Kelly , Patricia Hayes , Brompton Asa , Cory Teague , Terry Cook , Joe Duffy , Patrick Mulligan , Sea Cliff , Property Line , Straight Line , Front Corner , Public Comment , Combustible Materials , Fire Pit , Storage Unit , Building Department , Going Forward , Third Floor , Floor Space , Deed Restrictions , First Time , Time Around ,

SFGTV Government Access Programming December 30, 2017

See if they would be consistent with the ceqa analysis that was conducted for the site and consistent with current planning code requirements, and the proposed revision would be consistent with both. The only thing i would point out is that generally, if a project had already been noticed and comes back and proposes to raise the height by a couple of feet, it would trigger renotice. In this case, obviously, all of the people that have received notice and are engaged are verien gauged in this process. The rest of the revisions are just at the discretion of the board. Im available for any questions you may have. Mr. Teague, what was the what is the max height they can go in comparison to where were at now . So i think well, as was mentioned during the permit holders presentation, the height district here its a 40 foot height district, but because its rh1 dd, you take a 45 angle from either the front Property Line or the front set bac ....

Glen Park , United States , San Francisco , Duffy Cann , Bernie Kelly , Patricia Hayes , Brompton Asa , Cory Teague , Terry Cook , Joe Duffy , Patrick Mulligan , Sea Cliff , Property Line , Straight Line , Front Corner , Public Comment , Combustible Materials , Fire Pit , Storage Unit , Building Department , Going Forward , Third Floor , Floor Space , Deed Restrictions , First Time , Time Around ,

SFGTV Government Access Programming January 2, 2018

Conducted for the site and consistent with current planning code requirements, and the proposed revision would be consistent with both. The only thing i would point out is that generally, if a project had already been noticed and comes back and proposes to raise the height by a couple of feet, it would trigger renotice. In this case, obviously, all of the people that have received notice and are engaged are verien gauged in this process. The rest of the revisions are just at the discretion of the board. Im available for any questions you may have. Mr. Teague, what was the what is the max height they can go in comparison to where were at now . So i think well, as was mentioned during the permit holders presentation, the height district here its a 40 foot height district, but because its rh1 dd, you take a 45 angle from either the front Property Line or the front set back line, and that can go up to 35 feet, and then, it basically fo ....

Glen Park , United States , San Francisco , Duffy Cann , Bernie Kelly , Patricia Hayes , Brompton Asa , Cory Teague , Terry Cook , Joe Duffy , Patrick Mulligan , Sea Cliff , Property Line , Straight Line , Front Corner , Public Comment , Combustible Materials , Fire Pit , Storage Unit , Building Department , Going Forward , Third Floor , Floor Space , Deed Restrictions , First Time , Time Around ,

SFGTV Government Access Programming January 4, 2018

Just briefly, did get a chance to look over the proposed plans by the permit holder just to see if they would be consistent with the ceqa analysis that was conducted for the site and consistent with current planning code requirements, and the proposed revision would be consistent with both. The only thing i would point out is that generally, if a project had already been noticed and comes back and proposes to raise the height by a couple of feet, it would trigger renotice. In this case, obviously, all of the people that have received notice and are engaged are verien gauged in this process. The rest of the revisions are just at the discretion of the board. Im available for any questions you may have. Mr. Teague, what was the what is the max height they can go in comparison to where were at now . So i think well, as was mentioned during the permit holders presentation, the height district here its a 40 foot height district, but because its rh1 dd, you take a 45 angle from either the fro ....

Glen Park , United States , San Francisco , Duffy Cann , Bernie Kelly , Patricia Hayes , Brompton Asa , Cory Teague , Terry Cook , Joe Duffy , Patrick Mulligan , Sea Cliff , Property Line , Straight Line , Front Corner , Public Comment , Combustible Materials , Fire Pit , Storage Unit , Building Department , Going Forward , Third Floor , Floor Space , Deed Restrictions , First Time , Time Around ,

SFGTV Government Access Programming January 6, 2018

See if they would be consistent with the ceqa analysis that was conducted for the site and consistent with current planning code requirements, and the proposed revision would be consistent with both. The only thing i would point out is that generally, if a project had already been noticed and comes back and proposes to raise the height by a couple of feet, it would trigger renotice. In this case, obviously, all of the people that have received notice and are engaged are verien gauged in this process. The rest of the revisions are just at the discretion of the board. Im available for any questions you may have. Mr. Teague, what was the what is the max height they can go in comparison to where were at now . So i think well, as was mentioned during the permit holders presentation, the height district here its a 40 foot height district, but because its rh1 dd, you take a 45 angle from either the front Property Line or the front set bac ....

Glen Park , United States , San Francisco , Duffy Cann , Bernie Kelly , Patricia Hayes , Brompton Asa , Cory Teague , Terry Cook , Joe Duffy , Patrick Mulligan , Sea Cliff , Property Line , Straight Line , Front Corner , Public Comment , Combustible Materials , Fire Pit , Storage Unit , Building Department , Going Forward , Third Floor , Floor Space , Deed Restrictions , First Time , Time Around ,