the conservative justices, northern publican supported justice is going to feel like they re going to get too far away from that, in terms of what they sign on to with the court? . i mean, the dynamic is one of the big wildcards, in terms of predicting whether ruling is ultimately gonna look like. and it was the second leak. there was that lead to the wall street journal editorial board, earlier before this leak ever came out, which with without doubt didn t have to include the opinion. it basically told the story of the opinion, and so, there was a kind of a sequence of leaks. the leak this week into the washington post, where we learned about what, you know, what s happened in conference, and what john roberts supposed intentions were, and what he planned to write, and how many justices were on board with each ruling, and or concurrence, and each point in time? i mean, the leaks continue. if john roberts a stern statement about how damaging
freeze the basis of the opinion in play, so that now, none of the conservative justices, northern publican supported justice is going to feel like they re going to get too far away from that, in terms of what they sign on to with the court? i mean, the dynamic is one of the big wildcards, in terms of predicting whether ruling is ultimately gonna look like. and it was the second leak. there was that lead to the wall street journal editorial board, earlier before this leak ever came out, which with without doubt didn t have to include the opinion. it basically told the story of the opinion, and so, there was a kind of a sequence of leaks. the leak this week into the washington post, where we learned about what, you know, what s happened in conference, and what john roberts supposed intentions were, and what he planned to write, and how many justices were on board with each ruling, and or concurrence, and each point in time? i mean, the leaks continue.
up being ignored because we re trying to finish something by the end of this month or next month, and people feel like their protests are fruitless. so turns out there were others at enron that went before me, too, and they were ignored. neil: the argument was we all have to be on the same page, and they questioned your argument that what they re doing is illegal. so i m thinking, there s sharon at enron screaming that this isn t kosher, more or less, got some serious issues, but that everyone had to get the same talking points out there. some of them i m going to give th the doubt didn t think what they were doing was illegal but they knew you were not going with the flow and you were being disruptive. right? and also, for someone like me, i came forward because i felt also if what i said, enron might implode because of accounting scandals. i was concerned whiff whether the company would exist.