Charge. The truth is in the history of this republic, theres never been a single party fraudulent Impeachment Process deployed against a president like the one thats being used against donald trump. Thats whats unprecedented here. Its not the claim that a president doesnt want to turn over witnesses or documents. That, as weve said many times today, is actually quite common. And by the way, lets remember it needs to be noted again that President Trump has consistently cooperated with this congress in fulfilling its oversight you are listening to one of the many hours of todays very Historic House Judiciary Committee hearing on the articles of impeachment against president donald trump. Our live continuing coverage will take place over this hour and further hours as needed. But we want to let you know how were going to cover this. Were keeping an eye on this hearing. We have reason to believe there could be a vote on the current amendment soon. The committees obviously been going full s
A single party fraudulent Impeachment Process deployed against the president like the one being used against donald trump. Thats whats unprecedented here. Its not the claim that a president doesnt want to turn over witnesses or documents. That as we said many times today is actually quite common. By the way, lets remember, noted again, President Trump has consistently cooperated with this congress in fulfilling its oversight and investigation responsibilities. I noticed the statistics this morning when we started, there were 25 Administration Officials that testified before the House Oversight this year and 25 at the House Judiciary Committee. At the start of the Impeachment Inquiry the white house produced more than 100,000 pages of documents to the oversight committee. In spite of their allegations, the democrats know President Trump has a lawful cause to challenge the subpoenas because they involve direct wln are
communications between high ranking advisors and a president. Thats ve
mechanism. in state courts and federal courts if you defy subpoena out right and don t obey the order of a judge you can be held in criminal contempt and contempt of court and then you go to prison for a period of time. we ve seen that happen in cases large and small, large cases get a lot of attention but it happens in cases from time to time. i don t think that s going to be the end result here. i think as jonathan points out, donald trump and his kids view of the fifth amendment and the p propriety of invoking it is likely to change but that has consequences to, the fact you invoke the right against self incriminal inflammation can be used against you, no lawyer can make an inference about it, that s not true in civil cases. in civil cases if you invoke fifth amendment right against self incriminal inflammation, the trying to find you breaking a
to get twice weekly tests on their own dime and time until the official deadline in december. the union president estimates up to half of the police force might not disclose the vaccine status. thousands of officers could end up off of the job in the city with steep violent crime. chicago s mayor said officers who have not complied will not be sent home this weekend. but chicago police who don t obey worry they could be fired at some point soon. the union president has been encouraging his members to ignore orders from superiors to enter their information. chicago s mayor said the union president has destroyed the career as a cop and intended to lead his members off of a cliff. on friday, the laidest development against a president prohibiting him from publicly commenting any more about the city s vaccine policy. if you ignore a directive of your supervisor or worse, a direct order that s lawfully given, you re going to destroy your career. that s going to follow you
tucker: you have to give up your freedoms. nigel farage, the leader of the brexit movement, we are happy to have him on tonight. nigel, great to have you tonight. telling us that our freedoms are over if you don t obey tony blair, then you can t travel and do all kinds of other unspecified things we were once able to do and took for granted. what is going on? it s fascinating in that interview, he said we must adjust our freedoms. what he meant of course was the state must confiscate our freedoms. it s what he is saying is that is, if you have to have a vaccine passports i ve got mine with me. that is mine. that says i ve been double vaccinated and i ve done that in the hope i can travel to the usa, because i fear the international travel without this is going to be difficult. but what he s actually saying is more than that. he saying to even go to the local bar and ordered a beer,