It is 7 00 a. M. On the east coast. Police clashing with protesters arresting at least 35 of them as they clear the encampment at George Washington university. [bleep] [bleep] get back [bleep] [bleep] this just hours before d. C. s mayor and the police chief are heading to the hill to testify about this. Brian plus, Happening Today, President Bidens campaign is in chicago in a new push to win over minority voters. This as yet another poll shows the president s poor performance with the key group. Steve thats not good for him. And after 144 years, the boy scouts is going to change its name from boy scouts to Scouting America because it is a move to be inclusive. We will include will and pete. They are going to go off the grid on that. Ainsley i bet they will. Steve yes they will. Second hour of fox friends starts right now and, remember, mornings are better with friends. Its a fox news alert. Propalestinian protests in our Nations Capital turning violent this morning as officers begin t
fox news at night. breaking tonight, the impeachment inquiry for president biden is a go in the house, and it was unanimous among republicans. now the question is, does it make joe biden unelectable? meantime hunter biden defies a subpoena and refuses to sit for a house position. and instead chooses to make a public statement that may come back to haunt him. the senior national correspondent kevin corke is live in dc with the legal fallout good evening. reporter: epaing trace, after weeks of back and forth and a threat to hold him in con at the present time of congress hunter biden briefly today appeared in the capitol complex making a public statement outside of the building instead of showing up for his scheduled deposition following a subpoena from house republicans who, as you know, are looking into whether the younger biden and his father, the now president, collaborated in any financial dealings, particularly those involving foreign interests. in the depths of my ad
baier. breaking tonight we are following two major stories the president s son defy as congressional subpoena to appear privately for a deposition about his business dealings. and leading off, the house has voted to formally initiate an impeachment investigation into president biden. senior congressional correspondent chad pergram is on capitol hill with what exactly this means. good evening, chad. chad: mike, good evening. first the house wanting information from the son. then the house turning to an investigation of dad. the house just voted to formalize an impeachment inquiry for president biden. the vote 221-212. the house could have been on firmer legal ground enforcing its subpoena for hunter biden to appear for a deposition today had the impeachment inquiry already been in place. instead, hunter biden skipped out. all we re trying to do is get the needed people who have been blocked or refused to cooperate to come in and testify under oath before congress. chad:
for six years i ve been the target of the unrelenting trump attack machine shouting where s hunter. well, here s my answer. i am here. there is no fairness or decency in what these republicans are doing. they have lied over and over about every aspect of my personal and professional life. john: christmas break is almost upon us but it is a busy afternoon here in washington as any moment we are expecting to hear from the white house as kayleigh was pointing out, after hunter biden s shocking public statement and refusal to appear before the house oversight committee and republican lawmakers are expected to formally authorize an impeachment inquiry into president biden. so begins wednesday, hello, i m john roberts in washington. buckle up, sandra, here we go. sandra: and just 12 days from christmas, can you believe that, john. this is america reports . gop leadership has indicated they do have the votes to approve the impeachment probe with debate for the measure happeni
refullment of those sent to it. that is something the courts have already accepted. it is something that it is open to this house to do, and it is something in myjudgment, which is perfectly legitimate for parliament to undertake, it would be different if it was to reverse a decision against an individual, but even if i am wrong about that, even if, as a matter of constitutional convention, it were under social for this house to reverse the effect on a question of principle, namely whether rwanda is safe for the purposes of refullment, the facts have changed. there is now a binding treaty, which is not only binding in international law, but is binding in domestic rwandan law, because rwanda has a system, my right honourable friend the memberfor stone has rightly analysed the situation of international law, in in country we have a dualistjurisdiction where treaties are self executing but in rwanda the treaty is self executing so the treaty will be binding not only as a matter