The latest news from around the world with host Brooke Baldwin. Tr review the changing narrative on this famous sitdown meeting. First, dont forget the initial line was, there was no meeting, right . Remember, it took place back in june of 2016. Not a peep about this. And then take a look at this from donald trump jr. So don jr. , this is nine months after it happened, quoting him, did i meet with people that were russian . Im sure, im sure i did, but none that were set up. And certainly none that i was representing the campaign in any way, shape or form. That was then. Then in july of last year, the New York Times broke this story. And the story became that, yes, there was a meeting, but it was on russian adoptions or more accurately sanctions. Very soon after the trump team was then forced to fess up that the meeting was actually to get dirt on Hillary Clinton, and then the public was told, okay, yes, there was this meeting, but no dirt on Hillary Clinton actually came from it. Don j
president will understand that in time. are you worried the president will reverse his decision? like i told you, the plans are uploaded. it s public information now. no one can take it back. the dmak atization of guns would make it feasible for felons, minors, mentally ill access to fire guns. are you worried about the repercussions? i don t believe access to information is tremendously negative or a bad thing. people can use information for bad things, but this is not a justification to things to what, stop us from speaking? how would you keep a minor from downloading this information from a click of a button? do they perform background checks on people before they read books? it s not how speech and publication works. if it s illegal to make a gun in this country, it s illegal to make a guchblt you re vn.