know, durham s work was not being preempted. and that durham was doing something different. and he explains what he s doing different. and that there are areas of disaagreements. i think it was perfect appropriate so the public understood the relationship between the two exercises. so, you ve outlined a number and so has the inspector general, of problems with the way the fbi handled the investigation. are you confident that chris wray can fix them? and i asked that in light of the president s tweet today where he says, i don t know what report director wray was reading but it sure wasn t given to me. with that kind of attitude, he ll never be able to fix the fbi. well, practically speaking, i think chris has been working hard to address the problems of the past. we ve worked well together. the people hooper involwho were the past are no longer there. he s brought in a few team and i have confidence in that team.
conference cpac. joining me now to discuss is amy pard parnes. she wrote this piece inside waiting and co-author of the book 80 shattered, inside hillary clinton s doomed xab and author of the upcoming book the socialist manifesto. the case of radical politics in an era of extreme inequality and has a cover package called when did everybody become a socialist ? i suspect you disagree with me. i ve read your guardian essay on this general subject. you take the floor and tell me why i m wrong. i don t think are you wrong that people should interpersonally be nice to one another. we have have strong disaagreements but there is nothing wrong with having collegiality. i think biden goes wrong, he is a part of a political
together on this dak daca and immigration reform for phasion is a stretch. it is a stretch. there s a lot more that has blg to be talked about. disaagreements between republicans and democrats on this. but this was a fascinating meeting. shepard: it was. it was. almost an hour of being able to see a president really sit as the manager of a meeting where there was a civil conversation about fundamental disagreements. if you want to change the discussion, if you want to move it away from talk about your mental stability, this is the way to do it. shepard: the president was compromising, he was in charge, conciliatory, he was charming, happy, he was inclusive. it was wonderful. yes. it is what americans kind of hope washington, it s the way that americans kind of hope that washington works, there is a meeting where you can voice your disagreements and you can begin