Come across a situation that everyone as situational awareness of this and i will take his eye in my time when i was operational on the president s detail we were given the explicit instruction, hey, if youre going to pass it, if its relevant enough that you feel like you need to pass that information do it over the radio. And that was the protocol that we had. And i think over the years perhaps with the advent of technology and smartphones, perhaps weve gotten away from that, but we need to get people back on the scope, back on mission, back focused on what they need to be responsible for. The next question, ill put in writing. Thank you very much of you, mr. Abbate, but its just pointing out now that weve seen this rise in threats against members of congress, which of course is relevant to this 8,000 just last year, more than four times over the past seven years just aisle want to ask you in writing about the steps that the Justice Department is taking to prioritize these cases. I kn
Department, jeff duffy, acting Deputy Director, carla short, and stephen keller, acting urban forest for the bureau of urban forestry. Now, let me see. Someone can go on mute please. The Board Meeting guidelines are as follows. Turn off or silence all phones and other electronic devices so they will not disturb the proceedings. Appellants, Permit Holders and department respondents are given seven minutes to present and three minutes for rebuttal. People affiliated must commit in the seven or three minute periods and mime may be limb seconddegree to two minutes and given that theres a vacancy, three votes are required to brant an appeal or modify a Permit Or Determination or to branch a hearing request. If you have questions about requesting a rehearing the board rules or hearing Schedules Email Board staff at board of appeals. Every effort has been made to replicate the Inperson Hearing Process and sfgovtv is broad Catting And Streaming this Hearing Life and well have the ability to st
derosa confessed in a phone call to democrat politicians that the cuomo administration withheld the true and real number of nursing home deaths because they were afraid federal prosecutors would find out. the truth you see was twice as bad as they said it was. that stunning coldhearted omission is relevant and visible evidence in a court of law. he shows consciousness of guilt, and intent to cover up the truth and conspiracy to deny the number of covid deaths in nursing homes via self promoting, self worshiping self absorbed politician. those numbers were sought by the new york state legislature, the associated press, victims families and the public at large, the pathetic disgusting part of all of this is that derosa on behalf apologized to her democrat in the legislature for the political inconvenience their cover-up caused. no apology to the new york state legislature, the press or the victims families. fox janice dean for months desperately tried to find out what happened
universally accepted active shooter protocols. they allowed the gunman to remain in the classroom for more than 70 minutes. there were children still alive inside, one of whom repeatedly called 911 for help. there were wounded teachers fighting for their lives. tonight we take a close look at the false and at times misleading information initially provided by texas law enforcement and public officials to families and reporters about the police response. throughout this hour, we are being careful about what body camera and surveillance videos we show you. there will be no images of violence or sounds of gunfire. we want to be respectful of all those grieving in uvalde. some of the videos though are difficult to watch given what we know was happening elsewhere on screen. there s still a lot to learn, but it s worth mentioning had parents and families, reporters and others not demanded answered from law enforcement officials in the hours and the days and months after this massac
the fisa warrants? the concern grows out of the fact the failures in information that should have been given wasn t given and the question being what was the intent? what was the motivation and what we have determined was we could not definitively say what the motivation was. are these pretty smart people come up fairly well educated? well, well educated. i was going to say. they have law degrees, right? at least some of them do. so for people at this level of the organization? to be clear, the stuff that didn t happen on the view was basic staff. you didn t need to be deeply experienced fbi agent to be able to do with the right way. that is my point. wouldn t you say that would be muscle memory for people going through this process to know that they have an obligation to go through that? they clearly should have. so wouldn t it be reasonable if they didn t call you can t answer this question but to me, it seems have something a standard at that process for you g