as laura points out, this is dangerousism. quickly before i get back to laura, misinterpreting the relationship with north korea and china? yeah i suppose. yesterday s launch it came off of a chinese transporter launcher. that is an indication that has been weaponizing the north koreans. this is indication that trump doesn t understand the relationship between beijing or piece yang i don t think. lawyer ura up to respond to ? yeah, i have to say i completely agree. the way the president chose to flippantly convey his message in a very vague terminology. i don t know a security expert with scenario is a very dangerous game. you said some of you can
investigation in washington, putin will be more master of the details of all those questions. i suspect this is going to be similar as to what s coming from some serious experts, at least one russian hand whose now in the security counsel. the message is going to be let s focus on the top-line issue here which is these are the world s top big powers. we exist if a cold war style relationship, a mutually shared destructionism we have thousands of nuclear warheads pointing at each other at any given time. we cannot afford to be if a relationship like this. to get past it the president will be willing to send a message, he buys himself a lot of breathing room in the united states by saying you got to stop messing with american knocksy. you got to stop attacking with cyber attacks, which is anion going problem. it didn t stop in november after the elections, and on ukraine.
of deal because that will raise sppgs, why is he doing this, is he in putin s pocket. he doesn t seem to want to be tough on russia and that is a mystery. but hi policy has been do nothing, the appeal is frozen. major issues with with him carding ukraine, syria now north korea. this is the first time that there will be a conversation. secretary tillerson s remarket, did it contradict anything or offer any more perspective of what least the president has offered when it comes to the relationship with russia, meeting with vladimir putin what they re going to get? well it was very substantive on what he talked about, it was very sensible you re looking for political pollution. the obvious. exactly. but perfectly sensible, the right thing to doism but as i say, kind of odd that that was
an full fledge official bilateral meetings. but we re told by administrative officials there s no agenda. what does this tell you about this meeting? what is it if. i think the republicans recognize the president of the united states is not appear agenda kind of guy. they re not expecting a great deal out of this. what they d like to see is a relationship at the top between putin and trump that is gracious, that is respectful that maybe lay some ground work but we need more than the top man to top man relationship. you need all those people if the middle to start talking to each other, to have diplomats talk to each other. to have engagement on a if you remember of issues and to find of couple of places where we can start rebuilding confidence, because confidence building is important if a cold war, and boy are we if a cold war.