also sees a role here for its judicial nominees? senator, respectfully, i believe that s a question best directed to mr. bannon. he s not here. i m just quoting him. that s all. i think the white house does see judges as a part of this deconstruction. i think that they re seeing your nomination as an important step toward achieving this goal. you ve shown a willingness to disregard agencies interpretations of statutes. did you that in transam trucking with the department of labor regulation, for example. you ve done in other cases as well, and in august you wrote that concurrence to your own unanimous opinion in which you described chevron, the supreme court s landmark administrative law case as, quote, permitting executive bureaucracies to swallow large judicial power. you wrote, quote, maybe the time
judicial nominees? senator, respectfully, i believe that s a question best directed to mr. bannon. he s not here. i m just quoting him. that s all. i think the white house does see judges as a part of this deconstruction. i think that they re seeing your nomination as an important step towards achieving this goal. you showed a willingness to disregard agency interpretations of statutes, you did that in transam trucking with the department of labor regulation, for example. you ve done in other cases as well. and in august you wrote that concurrence to your own unanimous opinion in which you describe chevron, the supreme court s landmark administrative law case as quote permitting bureaucracies to swallow huge amounts of legislative power. you wrote, quote, maybe the time has come to face the behemoth.