also sees a role here for its judicial nominees? >> senator, respectfully, i believe that's a question best directed to mr. bannon. >> he's not here. i'm just quoting him. that's all. i think the white house does see judges as a part of this deconstruction. i think that they're seeing your nomination as an important step toward achieving this goal. you've shown a willingness to disregard agencies' interpretations of statutes. did you that in transam trucking with the department of labor regulation, for example. you've done in other cases as well, and in august you wrote that concurrence to your own unanimous opinion in which you described chevron, the supreme court's landmark administrative law case as, quote, permitting executive bureaucracies to swallow large judicial power. you wrote, quote, maybe the time