American history tomorrow, opening arguments are set to begin in the first where he is facing dozens of charges related to film actress Stormy Daniels. Tonight, trump is lashing out at the judge, again, calling for the gag order to be removed. Ahead of a hearing on tuesday. Prosecutor said last week that trump had already violated that order seven times already. Lets get straight to cnns Marshall Cohen and joins me here on set. So marshall, tomorrow is going to be unprecedented in so many ways. What are you going to be looking out for . Well, i am not looking to see the judge take that gag quarter away. Right. We all know thats not going to happen. Thats just trump lashing out. He is allowed to attack the judge. He is allowed to attack the da, but he is not permitted to talk about the other prosecutors, the staff at the court. And importantly, the Family Members of the judge. So he is toeing the line. Theyre going against the judge saying playing playing within the rules and limitation
crossed, as you the leading from your correspondent and israel when it out. there s israeli military activity in lebanon anything contrib these two countries back into lobbing missiles and rockets at each other once again in terms of the american role, it was very interesting in the past week. hearing that the us was telling israel to take the win and essentially move on. messaging to the iranians through, through allies that they shouldn t respond to an israeli attack. you wrote recently for a piece in foreign policy after more than a decade in which the american foreign the policy communities sought to de-emphasize, pivot away and retrenched from the middle east, the biden administration proved that washington can be separate from its confused approach. the war in gaza, a source of security in the region. so what do you make of the biden administration s efforts to tamp down this escalation while also continuing to support that warren gaza this has been a recurring theme of the bid
explain. what s your message to these partisans? hillary clinton has a lot of explaining to do. we, however, did not need to shift resources and de-emphasize, and in some cases drop the investigation on different agencies and organizations and different individua individuals. do you think that the results of the committee based o on what you saw will be fair, comprehensive, thorough, professional, honest? no, it s not possible. the victims families are not going to get the truth. and that s the most unfortunate thing about this. the nine months of research i had done is now lost. i have no idea where it is. . i know that i could give those victims families an explanation. of why they were told that this attack was due to a video. why are you coming forward? i m going to be honest with you, jake. i m scared, i m nervous, i know that this is i m going up against powerful people in washington. but at the end of the day, i need to live with myself.
it says the provisional all forms of assistance of the syrian political opposition. this is like a gulf of tonkin thing thrown in here. we re taking sides as an act of belligerence in that civil war over there. i was struck by it. congressman? so were we. when i read that last night, i thought wow. this has gone much further than i had thought the senate resolution would go. which was trying to define a narrow mission. and suddenly we had section 5 put in, which seemed very reminiscent to me of the resolution we worked on in 2002 going into the war on terror. i was very i was made very uncomfortable by seeing that, because i don t know what it means. there are some vague terms in this about deter and, you know, sort of de-emphasize some of their power. i couldn t i don t know what they re after.
this has gone much further than i had thought the senate resolution would go. which was trying to define a narrow mission. and suddenly we had section 5 put in, which seemed very reminiscent to me of the resolution we worked on in 2002 going into the war on terror. i was very i was made very uncomfortable by seeing that, because i don t know what it means. there are some vague terms in this about deter and, you know, sort of de-emphasize some of their power. i couldn t i don t know what they re after. and there is going to be a lot of debate, as you say. i bet there are 100 amendments on the floor of the house on the senate, and you see the same thing go on in the house. i don t think that resolution will ever be voted on in the house of representatives. let me go to congresswoman blackburn. by the way, thanks, congresswoman, for coming on. sure.