effort to steal the election from president trump. as we started investigating, both our investigations and the very patriotic and brave american citizens that have come forward are extraordinary, extraordinary number of people, extraordinary number of witnesses. and what emerged very quickly is if not a singular voter fraud in one state. this pattern repeats itself in a number of states, almost exactly the same pattern which to any experienced investigator, prosecutor would suggest that there was a plan from a centralized place to execute these various acts of voter fraud specifically focused on big cities and specifically focused on, as you would imagine, big cities controlled by democrats. and particularly focused on big cities that have a long history of corruption. the number of voter fraud cases in philadelphia could fill a lie lie library. lou: giuliani uncitiesed that it is that insisted that it is statistically impossible for joe biden to have pulled ahead in k
how a single supreme court seat can change history. and this may be one of the most propitiously-titled books to hit the book stands in a long time. [laughter] senator, it s great to have you with us and also we recommend the senator s book to you highly. i want to begin with the level of fraud that we see now. many people do not realize you were also a part of the republican legal team back in gore v. bush. it s give us your sense of what, where we are right now in terms of electoral fraud. well, look, we ve got litigation all over the country. the results of the election aren t final, and they re not final until the matters are litigated and the results have been finally tabulated. and there are recounts ongoing. you mentioned my book, one vote away, there s an entire chapter in the book on bush v. gore. and in 2000 i was part of george w. bush s legal team. and if you think about it that night, that night initially the news media called al gore the winner, then they
illegal what he s doing. well, he s putting people in jeopardy, and he doesn t need to be doing this. we saw who people would do in the capitol. they came prepared. okay, kevin. i mean, sounding more like me than like a republican but there s more. mccarthy expressed concern about republican lawmakers rhetoric fearing that people would get hurt. the tension is too high, the country is too crazy. i do not want to look back and think we caused something or we missed something and someone got hurt. i don t want to play politics with any of that. the country is too crazy, the tension is too high. mccarthy and scalise also discussed incendiary comments made by multiple republican lawmakers. they took particular issue with comments from mo brooks who said at the rally that it was the day american patriots start taking down names and kicking ass, referring to brooks. mccarthy said the trump loyalist had behaved even worse on january 6th than trump. you think the president
election case will successfully have his charges moved to federal court. that said to be the subject of an evidentiary hearing at ten, am eastern tomorrow morning. meadows requested hinges on the so-called federal law removal statute, which allows federal officials charged with crimes to transfer a state case to federal court. only if they can prove that the alleged criminal behavior was carried out as part of their official duties. in order to prove that, many legal experts say meadows will need to take the stand. fulton county district attorney fani willis who is fighting to keep the case within her county has already subpoenaed to witnesses to testify on monday. that is secretary of state brad raffensperger and his chief investigator francis watson. it sets the scene for a dramatic day in court, which politicos kyle cheney has dubbed a, quote many trial. the second key answer that we should have as soon as tomorrow when we could expect to see donald trump on trial in the f
sets the scene for a dramatic day in court, which politicos kyle cheney has dubbed a, quote many trial. the second key answer that we should have as soon as tomorrow when we could expect to see donald trump on trial in the federal election case. also at ten, am judge tanya chutkan who is overseeing the doj s election interference case against trump is set to hold a hearing. which she is largely expected to decide a trial date. it follows teams trump s request to postpone the trial until at least april 2026. that is nearly a year and a half after the 2024 election. over concerns that they would need years to wade through the governments 11 million pages of evidence. now, federal prosecutors quickly push back against that outrageous proposal, claiming trump s lawyers were exaggerating the burden. even after we get answers to those two key questions, there are still another major issue that is looming large over trump s campaign. the legality of his bid for the white house. here