is the least generous covering an average of 60% and platinum is the most anti-depressant. but to get these to ensure we have a sustainable market the law included the individual mandate and the basics are to maintain a central coverage or pay a penalty or attacks in 2014 it was the greater of $95 or 1% ashley threshold. h&r block recently cannot with an announcement that said on average the penalty is $170. because it says the greater of the most active is the 1 percent of income. . . well you d shearers to encourage them to compete on price and quality so people can really see very clearly differences between plants on dimensions like benefit and costs. the market place of course is the only place you can get financial assistance to a lot provide. first and foremost is the premier tax credit in the desire sliding scale subsidies based on your income between 100% of poverty and the slideshows how they are somewhat progressive and allocated. peg to the second lowest cost sola
threat to projects and homeland security counterterrorism program. he will be speaking on treasuries war, the unleashing of a new era of financial warfare. one final reminder. when this panel concludes we have to clear the room just like we did yesterday so the hotel can set up for lunch about 50 minutes and then we ll come back in and start our lunch program. gives me great pleasure to introduce our moderator this morning, mary derosa, distinguished visitor from georgetown law. thank you. [applause] thank you, everybody. i m very excited to be here as we have a really terrific panel. we are here to talk about cybersecurity, and how we address these significant and growing threat from criminals, hackers, terrorists, anarchists, and other nations who are spying on us, stealing from us, intruding, disrupting and potentially attacking our private sector government infrastructure. i don t feel like i have to say very much about the threat, gives a lot of background, particularl
let s go to a second question and that is given the way in which this nexus crosses two communities, the law enforcement community and the national security community, are we effectively organized to deal with these problems and the special issues of this nexus and how should we be changing our organization nationally or internationally to be dealing with these issues. any thoughts from the panelists? we should not go to knee jerk reactions when a major disaster happens and i ll give you an example. back in the days of my partnership of trying to bridge that gap between intel and law enforcement and work together, during that time we had an organization called the organized crime operation. s group. case officers from the cia, i had about 15, at any given time 15 to 20 fbi agents and analysts assigned there full-time. it was very successful. with regard to human trafficking internationally, we did two renditions in that program for major international human smugglers workin
interpol, u.n. headquarters in new york. among discussions was either to eliminate or cut by 50% the fbi s international offices. again, another act of absolute stupidity. i want to go to the hill and argue anybody who raises the issue to tell them how stupid it is, why we need the relationships, why we need representations, and how every day it affects u.s. and health of the u.s. national security. an example of that, a particular u.s. senator i will not name, landed once in a foreign country, greeted by the fbi agent there, and his remark was, well, i guess the fbi s sun never sets on the fbi. the agent was polite and everything, but he could have said, the sun never sets on u.s. interests either, pal. [laughter] thank you. [applause] we have a lot of agreements and initiatives that i had to talk about the americas with the americans. i m concerned about how demanding that it s been used to help been misused, and who a lot of money has been lost, and more concerning to