The western way of life is threatened by extremists. Mission to mercury european and japanese scientists unveil their plan to explore the red hot planet. Root to the rescue he lifts english spirits in his first test match as captain. And coming up on bbc news, well have Wimbledon Sportsday for you, with all the latest action from day four from the All England Club live at 6 30. Good evening and welcome to the bbc news at six. The controversy surrounding the iraq war then and now revolves around tony blairs role in taking britain into battle. Today, Sirjohn Chilcot the man who led the inquiry about the war has poured fuel on the argument. On the First Anniversary of his report, in an exclusive interview with the bbc, he said that mr blair was not straight with the public when he argued so forcefully and emotionally for intervention. Mr blairs office has insisted that five separate reports including the Chilcot Inquiry Have found that there was no falsifying of the intelligence. Heres ou
Fragile and Precarious Inspectors warn that a quarter of social Care Services for adults in england are failing on safety grounds. And what a Debut Forjoe Root as england test captain he scores a century against south africa at lords. And coming up in sportsday on bbc news its not the Centre Court Debut British number two kyle edmund would have dreamt of, as hes beaten in the second round at wimbledon. Good evening. President trump has used his first major speech in europe to warn police and protesters have clashed in germany tonight, as World Leaders gather their ahead of tomorrows g20 summit. President trump flew into hamburg after a visit to poland, where he used his first major speech in europe to want the very survival of the west is at risk. Addressing a large crowd in warsaw, mr trump drew on polands example of fighting warsaw well nazi oppression. He called on the west to fight against islamist extremism, terrorism and government bureaucracy. The famous port of hamburg, tonight
getting 30,000 calories? well, we ll hamas is siphoning lots of that food. and that s the problem. the problem isn t the entrance into gaza the problem is that hamas is stealing the foot of its own people and then selling it in black market. and some people can afford that. but that s the problem that appear to i mean, i mean, yeah, they are still existing color, still starbuck well, i think it s much less than what you suggest. i don t think there s mass starvation. there are thousands of people starving. i mean, there s 1 million over 1 million. i know but and that s why you need to defeat those were starving them, which is hamas, that it s must serve in the process. i think that would be the kind of counter arguments. so what should we do? that s my hamas. all right. so we need to defeat these thugs. the mafia that s killing not only israelis, but its own people and starving its own people because they ve developed this new methodology of war, where they do everything to inc
6th that donald trump had magically won a race he lost, and there was secret fraud and alien laser beams and all of this other stuff, does that mean what your best bet is to try to tell at least one or more jurors that your client, mr. eastman, was just really off base, to put it kindly? i think your reference perhaps in jest, i don t know, to a delusional insanity defense is a pres taj of a dynamic that will play out over and over again. john eastman, present company included, as other sources as a raving unhinged madman, and i think what the jury is going to learn, dr. john eastman is a academic, a grandfather, relationships with liberal professors over many decades and his scholarship and legal theories about the constitution were aggressive, certainly controversial, all sorts of counter arguments for them but well thought out based on
michael paulson worked with mcconnell. constitutional scholars actually disagree about this. in fact, since you mentioned podcasts, i had bowed and paulson, my law school, roommate on americas constitution podcast next week. i ll give them hard arguments on one side, and they ll give their counter-arguments, and will let american voters, american citizens, decide. and that s in the tradition of jeff rosen, who always at the national constitution center brings the best people on both sides and have the make their arguments. jeff always says, even when we discuss a decision, jeff, you always say, read the dissent. very few things come out of the supreme court where they are professional interpreters of the constitution that are unanimous. so, i want to go back to what i thought i would start this conversation with. jeff, the second amendment. which is probably one of the most disagreed upon amendments in the constitution.