speech on democracy, it s not on my time or yours. the riot on january 6 was dangerous and tragic. but americans are smart enough to understand the real threats to democracy are coming from the left. without her first amendment, art of thought stomach democracy is likely to survive. we know now that biden and his intel services conspired with big tech to censor opposing political views. how is that honoring cherished norms? how is it living up to our democratic ideals to use the most toxic and most vicious smears as political weapons? what we seen from brian kemp is a continuation of 12 years of racist behavior. domestic terrorism, rooted in white supremacy, is the greatest terrorist threat to our homeland today. individuals like ron desantis and greg abbott pedal in hatred and xenophobia. hannity: [laughs] laura: how are they upholding our system of government when they threaten a supreme court justice like schumer did? and then they proclaimed the illegitimacy of
it s not can work for them anymore when we are showing the diversity in our party with these candidates were going to elect on november 8. laura: what about the fact that xes is reporting democrats are only trying to assign blame among each other for what they believe is going to be some pretty significant losses on tuesday. when the starting the blame game, dissing the momentum. when they ve talked about abortion on january 6 didn t stick. the economy is terrible and people are not better off fundamentally then when done democrats took office. on every level, life is not better under democrat rule. laura: is looking to be an establishment versus populist, younger conservative split in the party? a lot of people are saying that in the leadership races that are playing out. i m not worried about that right now. i m just worried about winning. i see people, let s win now and
he said you look at this list of 25 from the federalist society. they have been vetted to within an inch of their lives. there s no chance, in his view, any whiff of moderation could emerge. in the near future. but if we re talking about someone being on the court for 30 or 40 years, what kind of issues are they going to be dealing with 20 or 30 years from now? a lot of things that we can t even foresee that probably won t fit into the liberal/conservative split of 2018. so when we talk about the destruction of norms, your argument for folks in the middle, folks on the left is they re called norms for a reason, and they could come roaring back into american society. we could look back at this as an aberration. yeah, i think so. you know, if the norms have been shattered and everything has changed so much, why is it that donald trump never managed to get in a reputable poll more than about 44%, 45%?
democratic presidents were surprised he later turned to conservative. not predicting that, but life is sort of funny sometimes. yeah, i m thinking of earl warren and mr. justice brennan, the latter of whom i named his biggest mistake in office, though in the commercial break i asked tom goldstein if that kind of thing is possible today. and he was a skeptic. he said you look at this list of 25 from the federalist society. they have been vetted to within an inch of their lives. there s no chance, in his view, any whiff of moderation could emerge. in the near future. but if we re talking about someone being on the court for 30 or 40 years, what kind of issues are they going to be dealing with 20 or 30 years from now? a lot of things that we can t even foresee that probably won t fit into the liberal/conservative split of 2018. so when we talk about the destruction of norms, your argument for folks in the middle, folks on the left is