to do an end run around judicial review, you essentially give them carte blanche to do whatever they want as long as they can figure out a way not to have a state actor enforce the law. remember, fundamentally what s wrong with this case is that normally, if you want to try to prevent a law from going into effect, you have to be able to sue the state actor who was charged under the statute to actually enforce the law. in texas, they decided, huh, we will avoid that by allowing anyone in the country, not a state actor in texas, to be able to sue anyone who aids in an abortion. thereby, allowing them to just avoid judicial review. now, if that is allowed, she is right. it s not just hot-button issues like abortion or gun rights or anything else. it could be everything that could be fair game. and that s not a blueprint that can actually sustain itself. so, the judges who already voiced opposition to the texas law are obviously in favor of letting it be challenged. but surprisingly, con