getting some of our biggest clues yet about the directions special counsel jack smith is taking the politically fraught and complex and unprecedented investigations of an ex president by the justice department. there are major developments in both the january 6 investigation and the probe into the classified documents. we ll get to that in a minute. but we begin with what we know about the sprawling criminal probe into the capitol insurrection and the coup plotted by the ex president and his allies and including those in the administration and in congress. as the new york times reports, jack smith steps us the pace, sorting through a mountain of evidence from the january 6 committee and looking to interview witnesses that did not speak to the congressional panel. from that times report, quote, did former president trump consume detailed information about foreign countries wild in office? how extensively did he seek information about whether voting machines had been tampered
do. and i would be surprised if they haven t talked to people, once they would be inclined to talk to the fbi and the doj about those questions. i don t think there is anybody in america who is serious and followed the news who believes that the u.s. has recovered all of the classified information that trump has in his possession. and this later round of discoveries that some poor intern or somebody at a low level working at his pack scanned material into a computer and maybe put it on a thumb drive that had classified information. setting aside all of the building of a criminal case and establishing the elements of a crime through admissible evidence, if you pivot and look at the national security implications, now only do you have satellite overhead pictures or whatever the heck he was keeping that were recovered. now you have a bunch of additional information that was on now computer media. that might have been connected to the internet. any good intelligence service is trying to ge
In EMOI Services v. Owners Ins, Ohio Supreme Court ruled a policyholder did not suffer direct physical loss of computer media rendered unusable. The decision reverses an Ohio appellate court’s ruling that the cyberattack was covered under a commercial property insurance policy.
how far up does this go? she doesn t know who was responsible for that. i only know what she s telling me and i don t think she s had access to computer media date. and i don t know if they can prove it was done with malice. you are looking and you covered it since the beginning, you filed freedom of information acts and looking for more information from veterans affair and the government. hearing her story, one wonders if there is a problem with technology. she was band-aiding a big problem? what do you so in the heart of the issue? why did this happen? when you step away from the work at the end of the day, what is the issue that kept perpetuating the problem?
Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - CNN - 20110509:21:07:00 comparemela.com - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from comparemela.com Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.