According to tradition, unfortunately, and why especially because no matter how hard we try, no matter how hard our candidates try, we have not yet been able to overcome this downward trendappearance, and for sure. Thats all chernukha who is in this year, it will only strengthen this downward trend in turnout, because voters, probably, are ready to watch circus acts remotely and not participate in them, because when the commissions there fight off the candidates. Yes, this is unlikely to increase the number of people wanting to come to the polling station, and i will repeat this time. We dont even have so many complaints about the commissions themselves. How many to some candidates opponents who used not quite often completely illegal mechanisms and methods of achieving results, not always, by the way, successfully. Traditionally, of course, we are interested in the work of observers from the party in these elections, especially since the ldpr this year developed a system for protectin
Meaning. While trying to enhance competition in the settop box market, the item shoots miles beyond that narrow frame on its very first page redefining statutory terms referencing to hardware such as navigation device, interactive communication equipment and other equipment to mean hardware or Software Including apps. I dont know how much clearer the terms device or equipment could be in their intent to reference tangible, physical hardware. If those words dont work to restrict the commission, are there any that could . I dont think that anyone here believes for a second that stellar could have made it out of a single congressal committee if the members knew it would be interpreted to allow the fcc to force them to stream all of their content for free to any app developer willing to jump through a few hoops. Getting back to the original question, why this proposal . The rational stated is to achieve parity among competing interfaces and first glance anyone can see that the opposite wou
Good afternoon, everyone. Good afternoon. Supervisor cowen okay how is everybody doing. Good. Lets look alive were talking about land use transportation thank you, very much. So this the meeting will come to order the regular meeting of the sfauvengs im supervisor cowen the chair and supervisor wiener the vice chair and supervisor peskin and our clerk is andrea ashbury i want to thank jesse larson mark that are troifg via sfgovtv madam clerk, any announcements . Completed speaker cards and documents to be included should be submitted to the clerk. Items acted upon today will appear on the may 3rd i 2016 board of supervisors agenda unless otherwise stated thank you so much please call item one a planning code to modify the measurement of roof line no the c3 district colleagues weve heard and continued this i got a request from the sponsor to table this item before that open up for Public Comment. Item one. Seeing none, Public Comment is closed thank you so much all right. Id like to mak
I was able to issue the violation for a long time as some of you may remember based on a complaint i received, i was able to go out using the ambient measurements. They were in violation of the sound ordinance 20909 and a few other Good Neighbor policies. The other initiatives at public works are working on existing sound proofing on working with interfacing with the neighbor and the establishment trying to move that along as quickly as possible and they were foind in violation of code 2909 this past weekend. I was able to get an ambient measurement the previous week and they were in violation this past weekend. Three citations in total for a good number of policy violations. Four of them in total. The director and i met with the operator today in the office. And we discussed some possible solutions on a security end to bring some of the issues to a close. With two other citations for the events that were brought up in our last hearing on february 26th and 27, at the armory, one citati
Govtv for streaming us live. Madam clerk any announcements . Yes, please silence and electronic devices. Supervisor aaron peskin please read items 1 and 2 together. Clerk items 150672 home detention Electronic Monitoring Program rules and regulations and Program Administrators evidence of financial responsibility. Supervisor aaron peskin captain paulsen. Good morning. My name is captain paulsen. I have been asked to make a presentation today with regards to electronic monitoring. The reason for todays presentation is the california penal code requires that the board of supervisors review and approve the data regarding electronic monitoring. Currently we have made no changes to the electronic monitoring rules since in the past 2 years. In addition, the Contracting Agency which provides Electronic Monitoring Service for the department is responsible for approving financial responsibility and that proof has been included in the package. A review of the Electronic Monitoring Program by the