Again, we would like to have this permitted before, the appeal denied. If you have any questions i would be happy to answer them. I have a question. First of all, your brief was well laid out in response to the appellants brief, what youve done, what you plan to do. You mentioned that the owner, contractor has been doing business in San Francisco, knows the permit is from modesto. The contractor is not the owner, but the contractor is from modesto but works in San Francisco. A handful of other projects currently Going Forward. I think the reference by appellants counsel was not the contractors working on other projects, not the owner. And then, the last question was, goodness, i forgot. Thats it. Thank you. Thank you. We will now hear from mr. Mr. Duffy. Commissioners, joe duffy, dbi. A lot of paperwork on this one. We will start with the permits, im sorry the permit that is under appeal, the kitchen and bathroom, three apartment units, no change to existing layouts, units 821, 825, 82
Have not been made. It has gotten hairy and dirty. Why not blow the whole thing up and start all over again . Or, why dont we give you some time to figure it all out, and come back with a suggestion on how to best either blow it up, or move forward with some conditions . That is fine by me. Might not make the permit holder happy. The permit holder made the mistakes. I know. As i said, just reading this today reads bad. I did speak to some of this earlier in the year, i didnt even know there was a stop work order. That would not be unusual. I can certainly go out there and get a grasp of where they at. Dont feel bad, the permit holder exceeded his balance, that is clear. The permit holder should be held accountable for exceeding the boundary while we are talking about accountability, lets get the whole project cleaned up so that the appellant can be happy. Which is the whole point of his ability to appeal in the first place. The one thing that i heard was from the tenant, he filed the a
Is because its surrounded by buildings of a certain height and we have to protect people from wind. We have to encourage sunlight for use or it wont be used at all. As we do that, we find there are certain thank you. Thank you for hearing me as a member of the task force in 2013. I was the chair of the energy and natural resources, subcommittee of that task force. My name is cole roberts. I work with a Company Called air up here, focused on sustainability in the built environment. When we were undertaking that task force report, we understood and interacted with the community that deepened our understanding of the neighborhood. It needed to be married with robust infrastructure, infrastructure for Energy Systems and the ecology of the place thats been damaged and not restored. Theres need for investment. Soft investment in the parks and also hard investment in the energy and stormwater systems. Its not always obvious in how it benefits the community, but there are deep, longterm invest
United states. There is also many important cultural sorry, important people in filipino and lgbtq and organizations that work on their behalf. We identified two Funding Sources, extension of Transferrable Developments rights program. The result is that wed have 20 million to funding rehabilitation of the old mint. Its one aspect, but can help to leverage more funds. We also see that there would be 20 million to the transferrable rights and rehabilitate and maintain them. As far as funding and outcome for fiphilippinfilipino and lgb communities, well discuss that in a minute. And also the final bucket, job training. We have identified 20 million in a new impact fee set to the maximum amount possible and the result will be funding for facilities that serve the growing population in the neighborhood. So lets talk about emerging issues. The 70 million identified and have some up. The first, social programs to support Cultural Heritage and organizations on the ground doing great work in th
Potentially possible to fund this work through our Community Facilities district. We need to explore the legal and policy ramifications, but the potential to do such things extends the program to the plan is personally very exciting. The second item is the need to increase Operation Maintenance parks and facilities, as well as rec park and others to identify the Funding Sources. The third is a need for neighborhood cleaning services, which identified to us from supervisor kims office. And well talk about prevailing wages. Weve been in conovversation wi organized labor on this and one option comes through the newly signed legislation of the state ab73, which allows cities to create sustainability districts if theyre paid for the construction work. We dont really fully understand that and will continue to work with people to see if its a viable option. That concludes my presentation. I look forward to everyones input and well be happy to answer your questions. Thank you. Councillor tang