intelligence committee, nor law enforcement obtained intelligence in advance of january 6th on the full extent of the ongoing planning by president trump, john eastman, who got giuliani, and their associates to overturn the certified election results. agencies did not, and potentially could not, anticipate the provocation president trump would offer the crowd in his speech. president trump would quote, spontaneously instruct the crowd to march to the capitol. that president trump would exacerbate the violent riot by sending his 2:24 p.m. to eat condemning vice president pence for the full scale of violence and lawlessness that would ensue. nordland forsman anticipate that president trump would refuse to direct supporters to leave the capitol once violence began. no intelligence community advanced analysis predicted exactly how president trump would behave. no such analysis recognize the full scale and extent of the
small subset of our evidence to determine whether it showed the likely commission of a federal offense. the judge concluded that both former president donald trump and john eastman likely violated to federal criminal statutes. this is the starting point for our analysis today. hello, u. s. justice department! this is the final point here before we talk about what the implications are of some of these criminal referrals. this is congressman raskin saying to the justice department, haiti rj, just in case you are not convinced by our precinct haitian, that there is a solid criminal case here to be made here against former president donald trump, you, doj, should know that we already had to present some of our evidence to a federal judge on the score. and when that judge looked at her evidence, he said, oh! yes! there is pretty definitely a crime here.
president trump would quote, spontaneously instruct the crowd to march to the capitol. that president trump would exacerbate the violent riot by sending his 2:24 p. m. to eat condemning vice president pence for the full scale of violence and lawlessness that would ensue. nordland forsman anticipate that president trump would refuse to direct supporters to leave the capitol once violence began. no intelligence community advanced analysis predicted exactly how president trump would behave. no such analysis recognize the full scale and extent of the threat to the capitol on january 6th. in other words, they knew a mob of trump supporters would be in d. c., that wasn t going to be a first-time thing. they didn t anticipate a directed thousand strong assault on the building housing congress, because they didn t know what trump himself was going to do that day.
condemning vice president pence for the full scale of violence and lawlessness that would ensue. nordland forsman anticipate that president trump would refuse to direct supporters to leave the capitol once violence began. no intelligence community advanced analysis predicted exactly how president trump would behave. no such analysis recognize the full scale and extent of the threat to the capitol on january 6th. in other words, they knew a mob of trump supporters would be in d. c., that wasn t going to be a first-time thing. they didn t anticipate a directed thousand strong assault on the building housing congress, because they didn t know what trump himself was
that they really should put trump on trial. once, more to congressman jamie raskin. mister chairman, as you know, our committee had the opportunity last spring to present much of our evidence to a federal judge. something that is jingles as our investigation from any other congressional investigation i can recall. in the context of resolving evidentiary privilege issues related to the crime fraud doctrine in the eastman case, u.s. district court judge david carter examined just a small subset of our evidence to determine whether it showed the likely commission of a federal offense. the judge concluded that both former president donald trump and john eastman likely violated to federal criminal statutes. this is the starting point for our analysis today. hello, u.s. justice department! this is the final point here before we talk about what the