With respect to the appellants allegation that the housing accountability act applies, we would disagree with that assertion. Adding twobedrooms does not make you eligible under the housing accountability act has been the citys position. We do not see this as something you would have to approve, or the Planning Commission will have to approve. Even the unit otherwise we would not be here. Being code compliant, they would not need it for that reason. That is not even what is before anyone, because we have a building that is technically before you. The third unit is again just added. That is not what is on appeal. What is on appeal is the two unit building. The concern of the displacement of the tenant, 30 plus years, as i understand it. The commission did not think that this was appropriate project, the end of the day. They denied the application. I am available for questions. You commented on the haa, which im glad you did. What about the argument that there are constraints on the Plan
Reason. I have a new project that can go back to the commission, rather than a lastminute change to the scope of the project. With respect to the appellants allegation that the housing accountability act applies, we would disagree with that assertion. Adding twobedrooms does not make you eligible under the housing accountability act has been the citys position. We do not see this as something you would have to approve, or the Planning Commission will have to approve. Even the unit otherwise we would not be here. Being code compliant, they would not need it for that reason. That is not even what is before anyone, because we have a building that is technically before you. The third unit is again just added. That is not what is on appeal. What is on appeal is the two unit building. The concern of the displacement of the tenant, 30 plus years, as i understand it. The commission did not think that this was appropriate project, the end of the day. They denied the application. I am available
And determination. There is a lot of new information that the commission may not have had, for whatever reason. I have a new project that can go back to the commission, rather than a lastminute change to the scope of the project. With respect to the appellants allegation that the housing accountability act applies, we would disagree with that assertion. Adding twobedrooms does not make you eligible under the housing accountability act has been the citys position. We do not see this as something you would have to approve, or the Planning Commission will have to approve. Even the unit otherwise we would not be here. Being code compliant, they would not need it for that reason. That is not even what is before anyone, because we have a building that is technically before you. The third unit is again just added. That is not what is on appeal. What is on appeal is the two unit building. The concern of the displacement of the tenant, 30 plus years, as i understand it. The commission did not t
Silence your phones. If you have any documents, you can submit them to me. You can bring them to the front rail and ill pick them up from there. When your item of interest comes up and your Public Comment is called, please line up to speak along your right of the room. Ultimately you may submit your comments by writing, and you may do by sending it to me, my email. Or you may submit your written comment to see our office city hall, thats Clerks Office room 244 city hall address is carleton place, 941102. If you submit your Public Comment in writing, i will forward it to the committee. And finally, madam chair, items acted upon today are expected to appear on the board of supervisors agenda on january 9, 2024, unless otherwise stated. Thank you, please call item number 11. Clerk item number 1 is planning code for fleet charging, location this may be sent to board of supervisors for tomorrows meeting. Thank you, very much, i would like to welcome district 11 supervisor, connie chan. Than
As part of the process were before the eastern neighborhoods on june 15th of this year they unanimously supported the increase in the in kind agreement and i want to read a couple of changes to the in kind agreement what we realized in the last week the fees is actually the total fees and not for the eastern neighborhood fees that is the only thing to get a waiver so in article 3. 1 the fees owed from 4. 4 million plus to 4. 02 m. D. 88 and for the record the remainder amount owed to the city goes from 2 million to 1 million plus that concludes my presentation. Thank you. Thank you. Opening it up for Public Comment not seeing any Public Comment is closed. Commissioner moore. Thank you so for staying on top of that one of the biggest dangers to take the fees out of the quality of the project were 0 doing the opts this is very wise including the City Attorneys Office is asking the increase in wages it is a winwin for everybody weve spent quite a bit time on the project when the issue of