Live Breaking News & Updates on Clintonv Jones Case
Stay updated with breaking news from Clintonv jones case. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Privilege more than he did. so we may be hearing a little bit more about that. there s also some thought that maybe when mcgan leaves, that flood could move into that job of white house counsel. but right now, his job will be focused on the russia investigation. on march 11th, jeff, president trump flatly denied in a tweet that he was making any changes as far as his legal team is concerned. let me read to you his statement on march 11th. the president of the united states. the failing new york times purposefully wrote a false story stating that i am unhappy with my legal team on the russia case and am going to add another lawyer to help out. wrong! i am very happy with my lawyers, john dowd, ty cobb, and jay sekulow, they are doing a great job. we know that john dowd since then is gone. ty cobb today, gone. he did add rudy giuliani, added a couple lawyers, miami-based lawyers to the legal team. the failing new york times was ....
President, who spends his time, you know, tweeting about how very busy he is with all of these other things, instead of being busy with all of these other things. and at the oral argument of the clinton v. jones case, justice scalia said, how come the president is playing golf if he s so busy? donald trump play s more golf than bill clinton, that s for sure. we also know there was a major meeting at the white house on north korea today and the president did not attend that meeting. he did not attend that meeting. he hasn t tweeted about that, but he has tweeted about collusion at least two times today. and yet in this latest tweet, he says, there is not much time to be thinking about this, and so forth. he s quoting this, john dowd, his former attorney, what john dowd reportedly said from robert mueller from the washington post article that came out last night. so he is quoting something from ....
The case when it comes to a legal investigation. it s true when it comes to to secrets that are involved with sblebl intelligence and in dealing with foreign crises of one kind or another. but if it involves the president interfering with a legal investigation and releasing trying to release facts that could impede that legal investigation, i think that president would be in trouble. yeah, i think you make a good point on that front. let me quickly get your reaction, mr. secretary, to cnn s reporting that the current white house chief of staff, john kelly, called president trump, and i m quoting now, unhinged. this is just one of many instances of top advisers criticizing the president like this behind closed doors, but as you know, word gets out very quickly. what does all of this tell you? well, you know, again, there are all kinds of reports about ....
Looks like the potential of an appearance of conflict. what is the likelihood of that happening, do you think? i don t know. i don t know. it depends on kavanaugh s own sort of sense of judicial propriety. if he believes that it will taint his future on the court for participating in a decision about which led to potentially his selection, maybe he does step aside. harry, you know him. what do you think of this? about the recusal theory? i think he probably would not, and he would cite the nixon case where three justices nixon had appointed sat on the case and ruled against him. the clinton v. jones case. two justices that clinton had appointed sat on the court that wound up ruling against him. i think it s important to note that he sees this as having undergone a major conversion. what you read about, don, actually post dates his time with starr. he s on the bench and he says ....
Power. when it comes to the question that michael was talking about, about a potential subpoena here, you do have a nominee, whether it s before conversion or after conversion, who is on the record saying that the president should be exempt from time consuming and distracting lawsuits. that does not only apply, i might add, to this question of mueller, but it also might apply to civil lawsuits like summer zervos, who is suing the president. this has implications for him. you can be sure that it s going to be really central to democratic questioning of kavanaugh when he appears before congress. and to your point on recusal, it is true that three justices on the court were appointed by nixon and ultimately ruled in that case, but none of them were none was appointed during the time of the litigation. that s true. so this is where i say there s an appearance issue. ....