people may die as a consequence of what this man did. it is possible the united states will be attacked because terrorists may now know how to protect themselves in some way or another that they didn t know before. i want to get and brought back for trial. and i think we need to know exactly what he has. he could have a lot, lot more. it may really put people in jeopardy. senator feinstein continuing there, saying the chase is on. today in africa, president obama was pretty dismissive of the chase for edward snowden. we re back with the panel. charles? so he doesn t speak to the head of russia and china because he doesn t have to. it s beneath him, you see. the mere sheer radiance of obama ought to be enough to persuade them to turn over snowden, and that apparently hasn t worked yet. i mean, the arrogance, that he s
32 if i was in the senate. i don t think it passes the house. i don t think it s fair. it s too much of a burden on immigrants and way too costly. the christmas tree ornaments embedded in this in order to win votes are reprehensible, have nothing to do with immigration, and the house will reject that. bret: a.b.? democrats keep saying we added provisions to secure the border. it s really not that. it s legalization. if you talk to conservatives in the house and senate, that s what they object to. that s not coming out of the bill. i don t know how it passes the house with that. bret: charles? in the end, what would help the country the most is that you trade legalization for a hard enforcement of the border. that s what i hope will end up in the house. they will pass their own bill. but in conference, you say, all right, we ll reluctantly give you legalization, but you have to give us closing the border, not as a goal, but actually as an actuality before anything real happens.
party, patriot or so 9/12 in their names were processed as potential political cases. andrew napolitano joins us. and charles cathammer. what do you think, judge? this fellow who runs the irs and we say it at our peril when we rip into the director of the irs. watch out, judge. it s frustrating for someone like me who was accustomed to presiding over questions and answer and directing them to answer the questions. he didn t shed any light and is stone walling. i don t know how much longer he thinks he can stone wall it. even worse are employees who take the 5th and don t answer questions to employers about how they are doing the work. congress has to get tough. the congress has to put pressure on democrats who will run for
committee, john kerry, secretary of state, scaring the daylights out of it, and the president makes it sound like it s a bank robber who ran from new jersey to new york and he s knot going to get involved. what happens? i don t think they want to try him. if they put him on trial, it will be a likely espionage trial the likes we haven t seen since the rosenbergs, because in order to prove their case they have to reveal to the world what they were doing. they want to scare him away, silence him, want him to go away. i don t think they ve decided what that is. i think the president was not happy with senator feinstein and secretary of state kerry, or he may not have known about it, before he made flip and unpresidential comments in africa. last words, charles. even as we speak, the president pretends it s just, as you say, a bank robbery case, they re scooping up every iota of information in his computers. a lot of stuff that we don t even know about now that could be extremely d