hey, everyone, it is 4:00 in new york. the question of when donald trump s rhetoric crosses the line was a subject of a bit of a lips as pivotal court hearing. prosecutors and attorneys met in front of a three-judge panel in the u.s. court of appeal for a d.c. circuit for oral arguments. the substance was the validity of a gag order imposed on the ex-president that limits what donald trump can say in public about prosecutors, witnesses, and court staff. the heart of arguments, how do you balance the first amendment rights of a defendant who was also a former president and front runner with the need to protect prosecutors, witnesses, and prevent the railing of the justice system? trump s attorney was grilled by the judges for more than an hour, judges pushed back, that they had no right to step in with a gag order. essentially what they are finding is we have a past pattern when the defendant speaks on this subject, threats follow. now he s making similar statements again
attacks, uh, so called attacks were fairly restrained. but when you read the interview, what did you think? i thought it was exquisite. no notes. seriously i m serious. i think he didn t directly go at trump at all. really well, but he didn t completely dodge it either, and i think what this moment is calling for in the republican primary. if you are not donald trump. is republican voters who kind of like donald trump. and that s almost all republican voters. they don t wanna food fight, so going directly at him with a big punch. i mean, i ve sat on this panel next to paul begala, and he says, it s like prison. you got to be the 12 punch someone first. i don t know if i agree with him, but i do think that the iron fist in a velvet glove is more of what s called for here. i don t think you can be weak. i don t think you can. and i certainly don t think you can say well, i m i m hurt. i wish donald trump was an insult. to me. that is a 0% success move. i think what how does santa s is ha