Great. I would like to thank the staff are putting on this meeting thank you to our clerk. San francisco government tv who are recording this meeting for prop posterity and no one is sitting in the directors chair. At this point, i will ask, you can read the next item. So, we have Public Comment on items not in the agenda and we have one Public Comment or one public speaker. This is for Public Comment on items not on the agenda. So anyone who is here to speak on the transit issues will have a Public Comment period for that later on. This is for people who want to speak on items within the purview of the Human Rights Commission were not on this evenings agenda. Youre welcome to step up at this time if you havent done so , fill out a speaker card and give it to the Commission Secretary. We will have a clock for the Public Comment. Two minutes. Good evening, commissioners. I just want to bring to your attention the issue of a Current Article in the paper about approving 10,000 scooters in
Of discrepancies because in the appeal, they said there are no permits or details but there was permits, there was details, it was signed off by the city prior to this issue to pour concrete and finish. We didnt do anything illegal, bottom line. That is all i have. Thank you. Could you pull out a speaker card . Are you chris gibbs . I am. Thank you. We will now hear from planning department. Nothing . Department of building inspection . Commissioners, joe duffy, d. B. I. I will try to give you guys so explanation. There is a lot there are two sides to that story and i just read the brief last night. I was involved with the case. The permit that is under appeal is a revision to permit application 20181023901. It is under approval. [indiscernible] there were drawings with that permit. Now i refer back to the 2018 permit. The permit that that revised was four level one that had two bedrooms, a family room, a study , a laundry room, modify existing bathroom. Level two, change existing room
Great. I would like to thank the staff are putting on this meeting thank you to our clerk. San francisco government tv who are recording this meeting for prop posterity and no one is sitting in the directors chair. At this point, i will ask, you can read the next item. So, we have Public Comment on items not in the agenda and we have one Public Comment or one public speaker. This is for Public Comment on items not on the agenda. So anyone who is here to speak on the transit issues will have a Public Comment period for that later on. This is for people who want to speak on items within the purview of the Human Rights Commission were not on this evenings agenda. Youre welcome to step up at this time if you havent done so , fill out a speaker card and give it to the Commission Secretary. We will have a clock for the Public Comment. Two minutes. Good evening, commissioners. I just want to bring to your attention the issue of a Current Article in the paper about approving 10,000 scooters in
approval of the august 5, 2015 agenda? so moved. second. been moved and second that we approve the agenda for august 5, 2015. all in favor say aye. aye. opposed? ayes have it so the motion is carried. could we have approval of the august 5 consent agenda. could i have a motion to approve? so moved. second. moved and seconded that we approve the consent agenda for august 5 2015. all in favor say aye. aye. opposed? ayes have it and so the motion is carried. i need a motion to approve the june 24 2015 meeting minutes any corrections? motion to approve. second. it s been moved and second that we approve the minutes of june 24 2015. all in favor say aye. aye. opposes? ayes have it and so the motion is carried. item 5 general public comment. we have three in the general public comment any general public comment at this time? hearing none we will move the agenda. we have the employee of the month, and recognize lisa leui. from the office of adult prot
on the white house conference and aging website. so you can look at what came out of the five forums. l.a. just happened they were doing something similar. so they kind of flipped the event they had planned and turned it into a forum. but it wasn t one of the five that had been proposed by the white house. and then on the day that we went, and then the white house conference was announced, the date was announced just two or three weeks before. and the invitations went out about two weeks before the event. it was all very, very tight. the white house conference itself, though being very different. there were between 160 to 200 of us. really what the white house, what the east room can hold. so it was a very different conference. there wasn t this opportunity on that day to debate big issues of the day. that had actually happened in the regional forums. but what we did have is a series of panels who focused on, i would say what we would determine to be key issues of the day. so