Different permit and the next one the storage shed has to have the next permit. Excuse me. Sir they have to decide on the jurisdiction then youll make your case. Is there any further commissioners comments before we go to Public Comment any Public Comment seeing none if you want to. You go. Your turn. You go. Id like to make a motion based on the fact that the Building Permit was foiled we uphold we not uphold. We grant jurisdiction or take jurisdiction i would suggest we continue it. To another time. To another time to give the staff time to prepare the case and resolve the illness kinds. Can i request the next paycheck if you could provides the drawings for the shared foundation. Absolutely we have drawings and photos and all the fun stuff. Well be cognizant of trying to defend it is sound it is going to complicated where the foundation is. Lets not deal. Id like to reiterate what youre heard the Department Staff say multiplements times over today what is issues are civil issues that
Fact illegal permit back in the era of 903 i have the permit here if you want to see the Electrical Service theres no gas service to the rear building heat is provided two the electrical there is an electrical water heater theres no gas and the Water Service i took pictures of the Water Service to the building and the building inspector indicated everything looked like it was code compliant from a plumbing prospective and talked to the chief electrical inspector and from the firs didnt see major Code Violations in regards to the Electrical Work at the property so i think it is one thing it is it struck me in reading the submittal package over again, was there is a Court Document where shall the previous owner mr. Perish made a statement he had in fact converted the restore building from a garden shed to a dwelling so we have no evidence of such a permit for the conversion from garden shed to a dwelling unit we did do two exhaust searchers and came up with nothing and generally speaking
Do you have Small Business from the Mental Health commission. We dont have dr. Sandra in the Child Division its more about Child Development i dont think we do in that way. Okay. Thank you. Any other pbts seeing none, Public Comment is closed. Heres another one we have qualified people and only two seats open. As you know, i was on the first 5 commissioner years and years and years ago. And i know that a good composition of the commission can really make a difference. And one of the pieces that i do care of k care about it the Mental Health piece because so much of what we did in the Early Education prior to the consultant we didnt have Mental Health and we knew i know first hand that we having centers in protecting areas like chinatown and tenderloin that we were in desperate need of having professionals in Mental Health that understood zero to 5. And that connection that we have now i really want to remain retain that so heres my preference i want to Mental Health worker in there and
Unless consolidated within one hundred and 80 days we want to save the taxpayers money we want to be able to consolidate those. To address concerns there were concerns about the original version about a vacancy held open until a special election weve changed that so that there wont be a vacancy but an interim supervisor that will be appointed by e the mayor but are in the be allowed to run for the special election that person will be able to run in subsequent election more of an interim official holders than a person severing beyond that. So the City Attorney has given us assurances that is legal it is essentially having an interim supervisor whether a term we have in place in San Francisco. For example, the clock is ticking on my being supervisor for 2 and a half more years. The interim supervisors about accept the appointments knowing it is only for a limited term and that person will be eligible for a subsequent election later on this will reduce the potential for the costs for a sp
Conversion. The permit holders is seeking to convert it to nonresidential use if the intent does not amount to a demolition then thats a conversion it occurs when the residential unit under go a use as defined by planning code or a change of occupancy as regulated by the planning code of any dwelling unit to nonresidential use in zoning controls on the removal of zoning units. The unit is a dwelling unit as denied in the planning code. Quote a room or scoot of two or more rooms thats designed or occupied by one family doing its own cooking and only having one kitchen the San Francisco Building Code riverside requires a Building Permit to convert it to a nonresidential use and a Building Permit as i stated earlier therefore the plumbing permit cant trigger a conversion although mandatory review is not required for the non residential units the Planning Commission can consider applications to remove dwellings at discretionary review holds the permit holder had applied for the correct per