gurudwara case, sacrilege case, death sentence, capital sentence, amritsar, kapurthala, what happened in golden temple today, golden temple news, sacrilege case, balsphemy meaning in hindi, sacrilege synonym, golden temple incident, harjinder singh, what is the meaning of sacrilege
Nirbhaya case: Bollywood lauds Supreme Court s verdict, says Justice Prevails
Nirbhaya case: Bollywood lauds Supreme Court s verdict, says Justice Prevails
After Supreme Court Announced Its Verdict In December 16 Nirbhaya Gang Rape Case Giving Death Sentence To All The Four Convicts, Entire Bollywood Has Come Out In Support Of The Decision.
News Nation Bureau | Edited By : Ranpreet Kaur | Updated on: 06 May 2017, 12:01:43 AM
New Delhi:
After Supreme Court announced its verdict in December 16 Nirbhaya gang rape case giving death sentence to all the four convicts, entire Bollywood has come out in support of the decision. Several bigshots of B-town including Sonu Nigam, Varun Dhawan, Dia Mirza, Rishi Kapoor etc voiced their opinion on micro-blogging site Twitter and hailed Supreme Court s verdict.
patterson said he would do absolutely anything to bring them back. jason? jason: trace, thank you. joining me now with reaction, fox news contributor and attorney emily compano. and attorney and legal analyst royal oaks. thank you for joining us here. emily, let me start with you first. i know you follow the jayme closs case. this is an amazing case. do you think justice was properly served here today? in the state of wisconsin, this was the most extreme penalty he could actually receive. there have has been capital punish. since the mid-1800s. wisconsin only executed one person in the entire history. so here, the fact that he received two life sentences without the possibility of parole, plus an additional 25 years, plus 15 for the kidnapping, then, yes, i believe short of a capital sentence, which was not possible in wisconsin, the most maximum justice could be served. remember, too, the family, jayme closs and the rest of
here, if you re assigned it or a public defender, wouldn t you go to the constitutionality of a murder case against an unborn child or fetus, especially in early term? that s a big part of the case, is trying to argue that constitutionally this cannot be a basis for a death penalty. there s a number of states that have laws dealing with fetal homicide and they have been upheld. in fact, the federal government are they capital cases? but we don t have a case yet where a capital sentence, a death penalty sentence, strictly for the killing of an unborn child as opposed to killing the mother and unborn child, where that s been validated constitutionally. it s a big question and dramatic appalling facts that create new law and could make this case a very, very interesting decision some day as it works its way
post verdict news conference that the court has set up. let s go through the counts right now. the most serious charge of course first degree murder. if this jury finds it was absolutely premeditated and worthy of the capital sentence she could then be stent to death row and she would be the 400th person on florida s death row. if they come back with no capital but first premeditated murder, she would get life with the possibility of probation down the line. if they go to second-degree murder, 16 years in life. a lesser charge than tt they give herrmann slaughter. that means she did not mean to kill little caylee. up to 15 years would be that prison sentence. then on the next count aggravated manslaughter of a child a maximum of 30 years on that. the next charge, aggravated child abuse, another maximum of 30 years, and then another four counts of lying to investigators, each carrying a one-year prison sentence. those are pretty much a given