follow his legal advice. my question to you, paul, the word clearly, can mcgahn s testimony have an impact on trump himself and to what degree? , it s probably too late. he has compelling evidence and it will be up to merrick garland as to whether he wants to bring a case against trump. so far he doesn t seem to show that appetite. if congress had been able to hear this evidence from mcgahn, it might have changed the outcome of trump s first impeachment, what the trump administration did was slow draft this case through the courts so that mcgahn would never have to testify to congress. now, alex, some of the congress people are mad that the courts didn t fast track this case, and so now there s pending legislation that would require courts to accelerate cases involving congressional subpoenas. complicated, to say the
priva priva private selves. if you can get them away from the camera and microphones they ll say something different than what we re hearing on the television and newspapers. that poll with abraham lincoln didn t poll members on capitol hill because they have a greater donald trump and one who obstructed justice can mcgahn and one who tried to cheat in the next election with ukraine and from north korea and turkey to saudi arabia and who has overseen rising debts and deficits at home and incoherent strategy and separates kids from family and really relies on alternative facts. it is a party of alternative facts and privately, republicans on capitol hill acknowledge that. carlos and i are good friends with charlie dent. he s spot on.