follow his legal advice. my question to you, paul, the word "clearly," can mcgahn's testimony have an impact on trump himself and to what degree? >>, it's probably too late. he has compelling evidence and it will be up to merrick garland as to whether he wants to bring a case against trump. so far he doesn't seem to show that appetite. if congress had been able to hear this evidence from mcgahn, it might have changed the outcome of trump's first impeachment, what the trump administration did was slow draft this case through the courts so that mcgahn would never have to testify to congress. now, alex, some of the congress people are mad that the courts didn't fast track this case, and so now there's pending legislation that would require courts to accelerate cases involving congressional subpoenas. >> complicated, to say the