Live Breaking News & Updates on Campaign Election Law Violations

Stay updated with breaking news from Campaign election law violations. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.

Transcripts For FOXNEWSW The 20240608

paul: welcome to the journal editorial report, the federal trial of hunter biden is underway, the first son is facing three felony count stemming from his purchase of a gun in 2018. prosecution rested its case friday after calling hunter s ex-wife and former girlfriends to testify about his drug use during the period in question and introducing his infamous laptop into evidence facing a bruising election campaign remounts against donald trump. president biden told abc news he will accept the jury s verdict of his son is convicted. will you accept the verdict no matter what it is? president biden: yes. have you ruled out a pardon? president biden: yes. eric: let s bring in dan heninger, bill mcgurn, bill, how strong is the case against hunter? the case is very strong. three felony counts, lying about being a user, lying to a licensed gun dealer, possessing a gun illegally. he had 11 days, he would have more if haley biden hadn t founded and gotten rid of it. er ....

Hunter Biden , Paul Gigot , Journal Editorial Report , Felony Count , Big Question , Drug Use , Ex Wife , Donald Trump , Election Campaign Remounts , The Jury , Abc News , Bill Mcgurn , Dan Heninger , Georgia Case , Felony Counts , Haley Biden Hadn T , Gun Dealer , Andy Mccarthy , People Aren T , Hunter Weren T The President , He Wouldn T , Didn T Charge , Bill Clinton , Drug Addict , Monica Lewinsky , Brother S ,

Detailed text transcripts for TV channel - MSNBC - 20181209:18:22:00

We also have to think about this notion the president made sure that information voters shu should have had when they were making a choice in the 2016 election, he made sure that information wasn t available for them, and he did that certainly to influence the outcome of the election. that, i think, fits our common concept of what fraud involving an election is. and do you need, nelson, to prove intent when it comes to an accusation of defrauding voters? we have to separate two things here. what would you have to technically prove if you were trying to convict the president of campaign election law violations? and the second is, what would congress have to consider if they re judging the president s conduct? i spent the morning going over the federalist papers, and kim mccraw made some of the language ....

November 6th Election , Information Voters , Information Wasn T , Campaign Election Law Violations , Kim Mccraw ,