only by the barest margin and only by winning the votes in the 11th hour of the most extreme members of his party. one promise he made while campaigning to be speaker according to cnn s the new york times is to make thousands of hours of security footage from the january 6th attack public. today here is how house speaker mccarthy justified his decision to release the video. because i think sunshine matters. i don t care what side of the issue you re on, that s why i think putting it out all to the american public, you can see the truth. so what could be wrong with that? well, for starter, he is not actually doing what he said. he is not putting it all out to the american people. he is giving it to fox host tucker carlson, the one who spent months downplaying the significance of the day and hosting people peddling conspiracy theories about the day, lies about the election. when asked about that today, the speaker suggested the objections were just sour grapes. did you
Defense production with all the support. Russia has ramped up as airstrikes against ukrainian cities. And Critical Infrastructure rain down munitions on your brave ukrainians defending their homeland now, america, youre going to send ukraine and supplies they need to keep them in the fight. This weekend or reports. This is i find this amazing reports of cheers breaking out of the trenches in Eastern Ukraine probably came from one of your folks reporter or some im not sure it came from but as theyre sharing, as they watch the house vote in support for ukraine. Its not like they dont understand what weve done not like they dont understand how critical this is for that im making sure the shipment start right away in the next few hours, literally, a few hours were going to began sending him equipment to ukraine for air defense munitions, for artillery, for Rocket Systems and Armored Vehicles this package is literally an investment not only in your rent in ukraine, security, but in europe s
and without long-range missiles and without very sophisticated electronic warfare to kill the soviet jamming, but that s not happening. ukraine doesn t have those. we haven t provided it, so we ve got ukraine fighting a sort of 1970s war on their side against some very sophisticated russian ew and against a pretty solid-looking russian defense and especially miles of minefeels to go through. you can t go through that unless you win the counterpart battle and you and unless you have overwhelming power. just a historical when we landed in normandy in 1944 we were stuck and we couldn t break out of the bridgehead until late july. we amassed 2,000 bombers. 2,000 bombers to bomb a tiny slice of a road at a place called st. lou. it took three days to deliver the ordinance and another three
the plaintiff s lawyer, you don t expect to get anything remotely like this. this is sort of like a these cases are like a kaleidoscope. what you have is sometimes you turn it one way and the reporters look a little careless and they look like they re ignoring something. the other way, you can see how they might have believed this story to be true. and what s really remarkable is that this comes in the context of the most different. standard, the most standard that you could possibly apply in a libel case, which is the new york times against sullivan standard, which governs the libel claims on matters of public concern against public figures. and that requires it s a bit of a misnomer. people talk about it being the standard of actual malice. the supreme court uses that word. but malice isn t required. you heard the term reckless disregard. reckless isn t enough. it s not enough the reporter blew past some facts. what you have to show, in a case from 1968 called st. amon versus
see the result any second now, just here. and it s coming out at 250 to 340 ad, so it s old, but it s not as old at st. peter. so if it s not st. peter the apostle, georges, then who is it? it may be a simple case of mistaken identity. there was another martyr called st. peter, who died in around 304. so it may well be a relic of st. peter, just not st. peter the apostle. oh, well, that would certainly fit with the date. however, this doesn t get us any closer to resolving the great mystery of whether st. peter actually visited rome. or what the status of the vatican bones is? exactly. for that, we really need to actually go and sample that material. but with no access to the bones found beneath the vatican, it s impossible to say