for harris. lawmakers are starting to hear from witnesses as impeachment investigation is now official. one republican says his party needs to get the truth. going down these impeachment routes could be a problem politically? no, i don t come in fact, if we don t go down these impeachmt routes, a huge part of america is just going to say, we are not supporting republicans anymore. julie: on the other side of the aisle, denials all around as you can imagine. shifting from president biden who has never spoken allegedly to hunter about business. that is their story. now, in fact, he was never financially involved. some he did at the white house briefing about this. it is certainly baseless political stunt pier that is what we are seeing. there is zero evidence and you can ask me about engagement and what the president has done with his family but there is no evidence spirit weight, but there is no evidence! there is no evidence that the president has done wrong doing. th
The recent volatility in the price of GameStop and other stocks has been characterized rightly or wrongly as an unprecedented populist revolt by small-time traders against big hedge funds. While the offensive by users of the Reddit forum WallStreetBets against the short positions of institutional traders made for a dramatic two weeks on Wall Street, the episode wasn’t the first, or even the most remarkable, David vs. Goliath battle to animate the stock exchange. Nearly a century before, in 1923, a Southern businessman named Clarence Saunders tried to orchestrate an epic short squeeze on well-pedigreed traders all by himself. The gambit was both spectacular and disastrous, ending when the New York Stock Exchange sided with short sellers and changed the rules on him. In a short span, Saunders who would come to be known as “the boob from Tennessee” went from being feted as the conqueror of Wall Street to being bankrupt and unemployed.