The goal or the purpose of the books to not only talk about how to revive the constitution and restore the republic, but to inform people on what the republic is supposed to look like, how the constitution is supposed to function and to move some of the Decision Making away from the centralized Government Back to the state legislatures acting collectively as the framers intended. Host you write in the liberty amendments about the 17th amendment. The 17th amendment serves not the public interest, but the interests of the governing masterminds and their disciples. Its early proponents advance, it is not because they championed democracy or the individual, but because they knew it would be one of several important mechanisms for empowering the federal government and unraveling Constitutional Republicanism. Guest right. The framers didnt create a pure democracy. That would be absolute nonsense and crazy. In fact, if you look at the constitution, its very complex, what they created here. Yo
The federal government is so completely out of control with the constitution that when you look at the various phases of what it is doing, it would be nice if we could break them into three separate branches. But it is more much now than ever before. And they dont check at much as they used to and of course sometimes it is never even contemplated, this massive Administrative State. And so its all quite important. And the goal is to not only talk about how to revive the constitution but to inform people with above public is supposed to look like and how the constitution is supposed to function and to move some of the decisionmaking and the centralized situation and you write about the 17th amendment. Because it serves not the Public Interest but the governing mastermind of the disciples. Not because they championed democracy or the individual but because they knew it would be one of several important mechanisms for unraveling the constitution. That would be absolute nonsense and crazy.
Probable cause and opposition to warrantless searches. You condemn the fifth amendment, condemn the First Amendment and free speech and religious liberty . Condemn all these amendments, which were also adopted by many of the framers who were slave owners. Do you reject them, too . The rational position should be, what did these men create that is beneficial to this nation . What they created that is beneficial to this nation is a society, if they couldnt be completely free of slavery then, is free of slavery today, and thats what the constitution sets thats what the declaration of independence sets forth. In other words, its set in motion. And the constitution, a governing document, set in place. So, i reject this idea that these men are to be dismissed, and one of the reasons george mason didnt sign the constitution was because he didnt think it went far enough on the matter of slavery. Matter of fact the issue of slavery came up early during the Constitutional Convention in georgia a
You could not have the direct election of senators without creating this allpowerful, centralized national government. They wanted a federal republic, not an allpowerful, centralized government. And they even made this case to the states when it went to the states for the ratification of the constitution. They said, look, the senate is made up of individuals chosen by the state legislatures, so youre going to have a role in the federal law making process, among other things. So the federalists used the senate, among other things, and the nature of the senate to persuade the antifederalists to support the constitution. And if we had had direct election of senators in the original constitution, there the would not be an original constitution. The states would not have ratified it. Furthermore, who do the senators represent . Its the most bizarre body man has ever created. Theres two from every states, we get that, that was to balance the large states and the small states, but you have si
Targets in the latest airstrikes in syria . Reporter u. S. Warplanes struck oil facility producing 300500 bares of oil a day. They tried to avoid destroying the facilities so Friendly Forces could come in and occupy them. Even attorney general eric holder suggested that Ground Troops will be needed to take over these areas following the airstrikes. Well have to look at the impact of the strikes we are taking. I also assume those will not be the only strikes taken against the Khorasan Group. It will take a prolonged period of time for these strikes and ultimately for the Ground Troops that have to come in and deal with these people. Reporter the Free Syrian Army they plan to wont be ready. They do not know who carried out the airstrikes along the turkish border. They say it was not u. S. Or allied war planes. That leaves syrian or turkish planes. It has been reported this morning that saudi arabia when it became the first to joint u. S. Coalition paving the way for the other four arab n