those are $2:520 for the home that is venting. this is one of those regulations that is too expensive to afford. the cost is as trom call and d.o.e. seas the cogs to the american consumer is $12 billion to install these furnarnses. you are going to save. an amendment. i think this is one of those areas where you look at how much it is going to cost. it is why this amendment is so widely supported and i encourage support for the blackburn amendment. i yield back. . opinion of the chair mblingt of. the amendment is agreed to. for twap of frappe. mrs. blackburn: i have an amendment. the clerk: amendment number 12 offered by mrs. blackburn of tennessee. the chair: the gentlelady from tennessee and member of will trl. mrs. blackburn: this is and amendment i bring every year and i told the chairman that he was delighted to see me back on the floor again on theier with the one%. and this is important to not that the proposed funding amendment is $3 . billion be low. but i got to say
bit, but in the first 45 minutes, we will get your reactions from yesterday and the charges in freddie gray s death being a homicide. for baltimore residents, (202) 748-8000. for those in law enforcement (202) 748-8001. for all others, (202) 745-8002. if you want to put your thoughts on our social media, @cspanwj on twitter. facebook, facebook.com/cspan. or send us an e-mail, journal@c-span.org. the newspapers this morning have the photos of the six officers, officer goodson rice, miller, porter and officer nero. the editorial pages of two newspapers take a look at what happened particularly when it comes to the law enforcement angle, from washington post, a step towards justice is there angle. the wall street journal also in their editorial takes a look at this issue specifically mentioning officers, adding this if we learn anything from ferguson, missouri and sat nilan that early conclusions about the facts and police confrontations are often wrong. if great julie was
public of the need for validity of a broad program. the concept delineating between the number of people affected or how targets are picked, versus the program itself, i think is valuable, and it gets to a question that i would like a from everybody on. there is a trust problem that now exists, for whatever series of reasons. an example of a concern that i at least have was revealed through a usa today piece that came out last month that revealed that the dea had been conducting a metadata collection program ten years before 9/11. one of the concerns and maybe this is pessimism or paranoia depending on who you ask, is that stopping a program like the telephone metadata collection program that is ongoing under authority, how do we know it does not show up under another 30? it is a sincere question that pre-much everybody, because there s no reason to hold the community to such a paranoid standard, but how do we get to that point? i think this question is a real challen
disease and you don t have money to treat them and, frankly, i think it s time to talk to the manufacturer of this drug and ask them if they are being very generous in providing these drugs, hepatitis c drugs, for free. very generous. for whatever reasons they are doing that. but maybe at a time when their profits are soaring, maybe they might want to respect the veterans of this country who might die or become much sicker because they don t have access to this wonderful product. and as senator blumenthal mentioned, if they are not prepared to come to the table you think you ve done well by getting the prices down by half, i m not impressed. paying 540 bucks per pill for people who defended our country. you sit down with them and say you re prepared to use 28 usc 1498 to break the patterns on these drugs unless they are prepared to come down significantly lower than they are right now. it s not a question of taking money. i know you ve requested to take money out of the cho
what actually happens when you have a small startup. the conversation around the board table every single month is about the burn rate and that is about not hiring too many people because you ll run out of runway before you get the product built and revenue generating profit. so, there s never a conversation about it would be really good if we could employ a few more people. that s only a consequence of achieving that hyper growth sometimes, once anyway great while. i ve heard someone say there s a kernel of truthd about this i ve heard people say the u.s. has the very best incentives, comparatively speaking, until recent things like patent boxes and the rest of the world great incentives to do the research in the united states. we can weak incentives of employment and very weak incentives of profits. all the incentive structure in our tax law and a whole bunch of other thing sincere yes yes, yes, locate around great universities and start the google, apples, everything