LouIse. ,. , happened In our country so recently, louIse. ,. ,. , happened In our country so recently, louIse. ,. ,. ,. , louIse. Yes It has been goIng On for far too lOng louIse. Yes It has been goIng On for far too lOng now. LouIse. Yes It has been goIng On for far too lOng now. We louIse. Yes It has been goIng On for far too lOng now. We lost louIse. Yes It has been goIng On for far too lOng now. We lost my louIse. Yes It has been goIng On for far too lOng now. We lost my dad I far too lOng now. We lost my dad In 1985 and we belIeve he was Infected In the late 70s but we dOnt actually know. It has been a lOng road for everybody Involved. Mas actually know. It has been a lOng road for everybody Involved. Was he a haemophIlIac . Road for everybody Involved. Was he a haemophIlIac . Yes road for everybody Involved. Was he a haemophIlIac . Yes he road for everybody Involved. Was he a haemophIlIac . Yes he was road for everybody Involved. Was he | a haemophIlIac . Yes he was Infected wIth
Growing chorus demanding openness and transparency from people and from government. So, who do they tap to run the probe? must be a blue ribbon panel of internationally renowned investigative scientists ones with no conflicts of interest. No ties to china or wuhan lab. Just kidding. It s the world health organization the same people who screwed up the last one and why don t they save themselves the airfare and just ask china to do an internal investigation this time again? they will get the same results. It tells me this whole probe is not serious. Now, if they are smart, they will bring back dr. Peter daszak of echo health alliance, do you know him? to run this probe. After all, he did such a great job questioning chinese chum last time. You can t pull the wool over his eyes at all. Watch. We met with them. We said do you audit the lab they said annually? did you audit it after the outbreak they said yes. Do you take it. But you are just taking their word for it. What else can we do?
Yeah, both the prosecution and defence focusing on the concept of reasonable doubt in the last few hours. The prosecutor arguing that there was no doubt. That derek chauvin had killed george floyd. Let s just listen into some of the deliberations from the judge. Deliberations from the “udge. Council made h deliberations from the judge. Council made a mistake misstatement when argued that the defendant had to apply when argued that the defendant had to apply unlawful force. As in he had to to apply unlawful force. As in he had to attend that the force he was applying had to attend that the force he was applying to be unlawful. That s not applying to be unlawful. That s not a correct applying to be unlawful. That s not a correct statement of the law pursuant a correct statement of the law pursuant to doran. That 87 west second pursuant to doran. That 87 west second eight 26 the state need not show second eight 26 the state need not show that second eight 26 the state need n
chauvin s knee. video of his death sparked a national outcry, an international outcry, against police brutality. chauvin is now facing multiple murder charges. he has pleaded not guilty. omar jiminez has covered this trial. preparations for reactions to events inside that courtroom. omar, you witnessed the 8:46 just a couple minutes ago. i was, of course, watching it here as many of our viewers were. intended to highlight just how long chauvin s knee was on george floyd. i wonder as you re there in that city now and there watching this moment unfold, tell us what you heard. what is the mood? what is the tension? well, jim, i mean, you didn t have to look hard over the course of those 8:46 when kneeling to show how long of a time that actually was. and, of course, it was meant to be representative of the amount of time that chauvin s knee was on george floyd s neck. and right before that, we heard from members of george floyd s family and their attorneys about what this mome
the ai helping radiologists to diagnose cancer. you can see these little white dots. the ai is highly suspicious. and in the fast moving game of ai artwork, who owns what? and can artists protect their work? for some time, artificial intelligence has been all around us. you might not have noticed it, but your video streaming services, social media feeds, the maps on your smart phones, they ve all been steadily improving their performance because the computers behind them have been learning. and then last year, something important happened. yeah. ai got human or at least it felt like it did. companies like google and openai started showing off stunning photorealistic images like these, all created by ai from short text descriptions. and then ai started having conversations with us. they were starting to generate stuff that felt human. this field of generative ai seems to have exploded so quickly. chatgpt is the single fastest growing application in human history. and it keep