Page 2 - Blsh Bret News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Blsh bret. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Blsh Bret Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Pass would have added the embarrassment of overridden veto he decided to go with it. bret: despite what they say publicly? brit: exactly. bret: all right, brit. thank you. president obama has tapped charlotte s mayor to lead the department at the center of the sequester debate. i nominated anthony fox for transportation secretary. fox is the first african-american the president has chosen for his second-term cabinet. if confirmed fox will replace ray la hood, one of the few republicans serving in the obama administration. new indication the housing market continues to bounce back pending home sales rose 1.5% in march to the highest level in almost three years. consumer spending also grew last month, increasing by two tenths of a point. the markets responded with gains today. the dow closed 106 points higher. the s&p 500 was up 11 to close at a new record high. and the nasdaq gained 28 for its highest close since 2000. a 12 year nba veteran has announced he is gay. ....
And as the president said in the oval office on friday. you don t need boots on the ground from the u.s. point of view but you sure do need international actions to bring this thing to a close quickly. if it goes on through the end of this year, the whole region is going to fall into chaos. bret: chemical weapons, syria, a red line, a dotted line, what is it? we re back with the panel. charles? look, historically, we have had two responses to these kind of situations. in the 90 s, if there was an attack on us terror threat out there, we lob them. this attempt went into md tent in afghanistan and pretend we had done. so after 9/11 we invaded and took over the whole country. now there has got to be something in between. this is we areing will for for syria. i think the administration is thinking that perhaps if its hand is forced. that we will lob a missile or two that will have no effect and will only sort of involve news a hot war without achieving anything. also, they talk abo ....
We are not going to get any support. nato is talking about having to have the approval of the security council, which means we re not going to get it because the russians or the chinese are on it. and they will exercise a veto to i think the only answer is not american boots on the ground and intercepting aircraft country with air defense. what we have to be doing is arming the rebels. the ones that we trust and do it to the hilt. we should be doing that. and should have started it a year ago but at least we ought to start it now. varying degrees of confidence is not sufficient upon which to base a policy reaction. a.b.? it seems what s changed recently first of all there, will be some sort of response, there has to be simply on humanitarian level. there is going to be some president obama on chemical weapons is waiting for a proof and cooperation but there has to be something in terms of. bret: although for humanitarian level for 70,000 plus people already there hasn t been a ....
The entire story are acting out of political motives is uncalled for. what makes this interesting is there is yet again new information. i think we had new information after coming out of the report that five house republican committees filed last week raised new questions about who in the administration knew certain details at the time. raised new questions about what the director of the national intelligence knew at certain times. and i think now, with these people coming forward, or attempting to come forward, what makes this interesting, what makes it relevant is that these are new claims. new charges from new people. it will be very interesting to see if the rest of the media continue to ignore or down play or dismiss these claims given the fact that this is new information. bret: a.b.? well, it s clear from the spokesman s remarks today refer back adequate ....
About, this the more we see stonewalling and coverup. bret: they still deny that she saw those documents despite her signature. bret: how does her signature get on a document. brit: i understand. she isn t there? charles, the fact checker for the the washington post describes it as the signature that goes out every single email including the general policy of the employees, it says secretary clinton on everything. and it is made by lower level employees nothing she signed personally. if someone brings you a report about request for information from an embassy that is threatened where the british and red cross have been attacked. you would look at it a bit more seriously than you would. so would i. the word signature on these ceablesz doesn t mean what we it s not her signature. it s an email that has her name on it and her title. steve, the special operator and i think she should have looked at them. i m not saying it s a true ....