chinese, they rig their markets no more than the chinese. it s an education there. whether this is the answer, i don t know. do you worry that trying to protect one industry of this president and any president down the road that might consider doing the same would be hurting lots of other industries. congress would be remiss if it didn t do something about that. i look at these tariffs as mainly a negotiating tool. i know he has to put bite behind them. by the way, the markets have agreed with you. they don t think it s going to happen. it could happen. it could happen. at the same time, let s not forget canada has almost 20,000 tariffs implemented. we have all of these trade imbalances and trade deficits. quite frankly, forget the steel and aluminum situation. what trump is saying enough of the past. we are having a new era, knew rules of engagement. we re going to have fair truth.
neil: your colleague, senator corker is among them that thinks this should get a senate yay or nay when we re looking at doing what the president is doing, tariffs and along. i m always a believener congress taking its power back. we ve given up too much power to the president. so i m always in favor of gaining that power back. neil: all right. a lot of republican senators that feel that way and concerned that the president, any president, takes too much on his own when they decide things like tariffs and trade issues that are typically the responsibility of congress and more to the important when it comes to international arrangements. ned ryan is here. this could be a moot point. because i can t envision mitch
paper and we hope to submit a document that congress would have a say in that would give currency and elongation to the process that when administrations change and when they do, 6 1/2 years from now, when that takes place, that chairman kim will have comfort that american policy will continue to down the same path that on the course that we hope we set in singapore. one last question. when you talked about congress signs off on, are you referring to a treaty, and secondly [indiscernible]. and finally the you discuss the format of the meeting with the president and chairman kim?