Ban Question News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Ban question. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Ban Question Today - Breaking & Trending Today
Exhibiting the kind of profound indifference to the racial contours of the jeff session nomination that i wouldnt have expected from somebody as savvy as mitch mcconnell. If they did that on purpose to be racially provocative, to stir you racial currents here, i think thats scary and gross. If they did it accidentally, i think its political malpractice. But i think theyve just turned this issue and Elizabeth Warren and the Jeff Sessions nomination into a much hotter, more hotly contested and sort of scarier thing that its been up until now. It was remarkable. Do you think it changes any votes . Thats my last question. I dont know. Weve seen a lot of republicans say they were willing to support Jeff Sessions, joe mancion. An extraordinary legal battle over the fate of the travel ban. A threejudge panel is considering an a ....
Office. 12 governor ships and 958 legislative seats. this has ban question i have had about trump too. obama did too. democrats did well when obama was ton ballot. they didn t do as well when obama was not ton ballot. right. he was and a political force. his popularity never transferred down the ballot. we saw that given all of the heavy lifting he did on her part. so again, will it make a differen difference? i don t know. you have people saying that former president obama again feels like the stakes are so high that he has to get involved no matter if it does have the unintended consequence. and importantly democrats want him to be involved. that s right. they want him. you re not going to refuse a former president of the united states who has that kind of appeal. democrats flow in these ....
Decided it was appropriate for her to pursue them. and mrs. trump has a very strong case on the underlying issue. the question is whether it worth that many millions, the lawyers tend to do some inflation. they ve applied for trademarks for make america great, keep america great, which show a nexus of the political to make money. you don t need to make money to get votes. that s why we ve talked about the importance of having then donald trump, now president trump, there s a reason we don t want people in public service to be putting themselves in position to directly benefit from that service, at least in a financial sense. thank you both for joining me tonight. ....
That doesn t cover everybody in the united states, but it doesn t mean it not discrimination. so i think there s a plausible and a very good solid argument that they re making that it doesn t have to be perfect discrimination in order for it to be unconstitutional and problematic. there are so many different lines of attack here, which is common, because lawyers like to put everything on the menu for a judge. putting your litigation hat on, which do you think are most likely to get the ban permanently struck down? i think there a range of question. i think there s an equal protection argument with respect to discrimination. i think the first amendment with respect to religion i think is also strong. there are a lot of there are state court arguments, state constitutional arguments, a lot of stuff that s in there. i think the strongest piece is that president trump and his folks said pretty clearly that they wanted to create a ban. they actually wanted to create a ....
the yes. don t count the pause. this is as clear a power clash as you ll hear in court. trump s lawyers telling the judge this is basically none of their business. they do have some law on their side. but one of the questions in this case is whether the government is conducting religious discrimination, which is unconstitutional. the judge asked if this is a religious ban would the court doors be open, could someone have standing for that? the question drew a concession from lawyers that there are court cases, a 1972 case called mandel that would open the court s doors. if the order said muslims cannot be admitted, would anybody have standing to challenge that? i think mandel and din give a route to make a constitutional challenge if there were such an order. then the judges pushed further saying the muslim ban ....