relied on the chloroform in the car. i agree with wendy. i don t think there was any chloroform there. i think he has an unproved novel machine that the judge allowed in. we have polygraphs lie detectors for hundred years that are not allowed in court but the judge allows in a totally unreliable machine that allegedly found floor form. i don think there was any chloroform there other than background chloroform. what they could have done and didn t do is test the flies and maggots in the car and see if they ped on the baby. if they feed on something it will have the child s dna. they didn t do that they went with the unreliable thing to bring up chloroform isn t a part
that s correct. what s the deal with that? well, remember, cindy anthony, she testified to this. you told me at your deposition that you searched for chloraphyll. correct. and you spelled it for me. do you recall that. yes. do you recall denying that you made any searches for how to make chloroform? i didn t look up how to make chloroform. yes, i looked up chloroform in t the when you look up chloroform, you don t have to look up how to make it on there. it tells you what the chance are. i mean, liao being look i a 0 cording to the computer she s making it up out of thin air, doesn t it sound like. it sounds like. there was testimony, maybe there was one search, maybe there was 84. all kinds of strange testimony, but the issue becomes who actually did the search? and now, we have evidence that
and now i don t think she ll get the charge of perjury. gregg: this was important, the issue of chloroform, goes to the issue of first degree murder, death penalty eligible, you ve got to perfect planning and premeditation and the searching in advance of her daughter s death, chloroform. yes, and also the testimony that they found chloroform. the only person who finds chloroform is dr. vass with his novel, unconfirmed sniffer machine he s trying to sell and which he uses divining rod to find bodies, too. and other people who examined the same specimen didn t find any increase in the background chloroform, didn t find any of the decomposition chemicals. so, i think, i think that that s an issue as to whether there s any chloroform to fin with. as a conviction this is a fatal flaw in the defense case. i was expecting before
admonition to them that they can t comment on the testimony based on my opening in this case. so, either some of us are going to talk about it or all of us going to talk about it or all of us not going to talk about it. and there s a picture of little caylee near the end of the cliff and looking at the sunset, and the inference that she fell off that cliff what peter is saying, here where they opened on it and clear what they re going for and jose baez would have tried, were it not for the judge s ruling, the statement to the girlfriend, he said it was an accident, there s the proof it s an accident. i would say by the same token if i m the defense lawyer, where he s the evidence of chloroform, where is the m of of the chloroform, how do you take the duct tape in casey anthony s hands.
mrs. anthony went 0 on the stand in the closing jose baez would say the prosecution never proved who was making the searches. we know we had a nurse there, a former police detective there. gregg: now he can t say that. can t say it now. gregg: and it gets worse, i want to play another clip. there was a different person on the witness stand called by the prosecution and this guy is it a computer expert, kevin stinger, he was called to the stand to dispute cindy anthony s testimony about looking up the word color chloraphyll and chloroform. when you searched for chloraphyll. there were no hits during the searches. that s correct. does that mean there s no search for chloraphyll in conjunction with the chloroform related entries.