Attacking Fox News Today : Breaking News, Live Updates & Top Stories | Vimarsana
Stay updated with breaking news from Attacking fox. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
Top News In Attacking Fox Today - Breaking & Trending Today
palin political ap map that the gunman never even saw. but when a liberal bernie sanders supporter wounded steve scalise and others five years ago at a congressional republican baseball practice, the media didn t blame left-wing philosophy, and they shouldn t have is. yet after mostly black shoppers with were gunned down in buffalo, people who don t like this network unleashed this constant barrage. it s partially fox s fault. it s not even a new pretext, a new justification for violent, racist terrorism. it has long been so. it is right now being newly-popularized by the biggest fans in conservative media. those conspiracies pushed by a former president, house republican leaders, social media monopolies and a powerful cable news network. this vision of the country belonging to some americans, white americans, right, is only going on the right. and you can hear it on any given night on fox news. howard: a chief target has been tucker carlson. his comments are, of ....
White americans, right, is only going on the right. and you can hear it on any given night on fox news. howard: a chief target has been tucker carlson. his comments are, of course, fair game for public debate, but blaming him for the shooting is absurd. the latest case of a blood on your hands ea approach to finger-pointing, even if you re chuck schumer trying to score political points by attacking fox. by the way, there s nothing in the suspect s hundreds of rambling pages that indicates he has ever watched one minute of fox news. i m howard kurtz, and this is mediabuzz. howard: ahead, a wide-ranging interview with radio host hugh hewitt on coverage of the midterms. an old sexual harassment allegation against elon musk reas far ass after he said ....
A lot of readers of the wall street journal are more inclined to be favorable toward the president. so i m glad he did that there. if he d written it in the new york times, for instance, i think it would have been for people who almost many of whom were inclined to already agree with him. and i think that s one of the issues we have in the country, is we tend to filter out those with whom we disagree. we saw it today with the president attacking fox. fox is apparently reporting things, had some guests on that the president didn t like. and so the president unleashes a first strike nuclear rhetorical attack against the network. that s emblematic of the way our political conversation goes now. and one thing i would just say with all respect to the general s point in that, he says, we re better than our current politics. i would amend that slightly. we can be better than our current politics, but we aren t ....
Think it would have been for people who almost many of whom were inclined to already agree with him. and i think that s one of the issues we have in the country, is we tend to filter out those with whom we disagree. we saw it today with the president attacking fox. fox is apparently reporting things, had some guests on that the president didn t like. and so the president unleashes a first strike nuclear rhetorical attack against the network. that s emblematic of the way our political conversation goes now. and one thing i would just say with all respect to the general s point in that, he says, we re better than our current politics. i would amend that slightly. we can be better than our current politics, but we aren t always. and the forces that the president represents are perennial ones in american life. isolationism, xenophobia, nativism, and those forces either ebb or flow. ....
well, people who we tend to revere people more so when they are out of the arena than when they re in the arena, which is an interesting american characteristic. so people will listen. part of what general mattis, secretary mattis, was saying there, though, represents and denotes the problem that he will have in being heard by people who aren t already inclined to agree with him. right? so it s interesting that he wrote that for the journal. a lot of readers of the wall street journal are more inclined to be favorable toward the president. so i m glad he did that there. if he d written it in the new york times, for instance, i think it would have been for people who almost many of whom were inclined to already agree with him. and i think that s one of the issues we have in the country, is we tend to filter out those with whom we disagree. we saw it today with the president attacking fox. ....