Stay updated with breaking news from Associate editor. Get real-time updates on events, politics, business, and more. Visit us for reliable news and exclusive interviews.
difference of opinion on immigration legislation that we ve put forward. you ve had different ideas. i have no doubt that as attorney general, you ll faithfully execute the office. i appreciate the answers that you have given today. unanimous consent to submit a column written by our own attorney general in arizona, mark burnovich for the hill . without objection it will be included. supporting your nomination. let me talk to you about an aspect of immigration that s important in arizona. as you know, we have a large border with mexico. we have a program called operation streamline that has over the years been tremendously effective in cutting down recidivism in terms of border crossers. it s intended to reduce border crossing by expeditiously prosecuting those who enter the country illegally over a no tolerance or zero tolerance policy. it s credited with being instrumental in achieving better border security specifically in the yuma sector along the western side of ariz ....
fbi before he fired him last february. setting off a new round of questions about whether the president s actions amount to obstruction of justice. well, if you take the president s own statement, his tweet that he knew michael flynn was lying to the fbi when he fired him, which means that he knew michael flynn had committed a felony when he asked comey to stop the investigation. and when he fired comey when he refused to do so and when he fired sally yates and when he called michael flynn in april to tell him to stay strong. all of these acts are to impede and obstruct justice. a source close to the white house acknowledging the severity of the misstep to the washington post which writes a person close to the white house involved in the case turned the saturday tweet a screw up of historic proportions that has caused enormous consternation in to in legal circles about whether or not a lawyer would have sent a tweet or even dictated a tweet like the one that came from th ....
prosperity. second, the united states and north korea will join their efforts to build a lasting and stable peace regime on the korean pinsula. third, north korea commits to workd the complete denuclearization of the korean peninsula. and finally, the united states and the north commit to recoveringrisoners of war, missing in action remains, including the immediate repatriation of those already identified. president trump held a news conference just a short time ago and revealed what appears to be a major concession on the american side ending the u.s./south korea joint military exercises which he called war games. can you be specific about what assurances you are willing to give to kim jong-un? does that include reducing military capabilities and just to follow up on your answer no, we re not reducing anything. at some point i have to be host and i used to say this during my campaign, as you know probably better than most, i want to get our soldiers out and bring our so ....
canceled it? on friday, the new york times wrote the following. quote, a senior white house official told reporters that even if the meeting were reinstated holding it on june 12 would be impossible given the lack of time needed. president trump 1307bded on twitter with this false accusation. quote, the failing the new york times quotes a senior white house official who doesn t exist, use real people, not phony sources. the source was, in fact, a senior white house official speaking to a large group of reporters in the white house briefing room. we journalists try as hard as we can to always identify our sources on the record so that we can tell you, our viewers, watchers, listeners, why you should trust our information. sometimes we agree to allow people to speak anonymously. we ll refer to that as talking on background. nbc news does know the identity of this official, although we re not identifying him because we agreed not to. we, however, do not invent people. if we did, ....
russia s actions at no way at all on the outcome of the election let me be totally clear in saying that and i ve said this many times i accept our intelligence communities conclusion that russia s meddling in the two thousand and sixteen election took place could be other people also. a lot of people out there there was no collusion at all. we re clear on that there was no collusion let s get more from did abuse the washington bureau chief an example of the welcome alex on that this is not a president known for backing down so what has brought this about. i think that was the harsh criticism the president has been facing since does it with blood in the poutine criticism most notably within his own republican party with republican lonely occurs describing war today so on housing key. disgraceful and shameful and with republican leaders in congress trying to distance themselves from this president and charm so all of this on t.v. we know that he likes to look good on t.v. we kno ....